Ich habe mich immer gefragt, warum Komödien im Vergleich zu Dramen tendenziell schlechtere Bewertungen erhalten. Es schien, dass Dramen auf IMDb durchweg höhere Bewertungen erzielten. Um die zugrunde liegenden Gründe zu verstehen und meine Beobachtungen zu überprüfen, habe ich eine datenwissenschaftliche Analyse mit Python durchgeführt. Durch dieses Projekt konnte ich Antworten auf die Fragen finden, die mir im Kopf herumschwirrten.

    Q1. Welches Genre ist "Einfacher" machen? (Action vs. Drama vs. Komödie)

    A1. Es ist erheblich "Einfacher" um ein akzeptables Drama zu machen, als um einen akzeptablen Action- oder Comedy-Film.

    Q2. Sollte ich für Komödien niedrigere Suchgrenzen als für Drama verwenden?

    A2. JA. Absolut.

    Ich habe Python und Matplotlib verwendet, um Daten zu verarbeiten und zu visualisieren. Wenn Sie den Denkprozess oder den Quellcode sehen möchten, Hier ist es.

    Daten: IMDb-Datendateien
    1. https://datasets.imdbws.com/title.basics.tsv.gz

    2. https://datasets.imdbws.com/title.ratings.tsv.gz

    Von fezcodex

    Share.

    5 Kommentare

    1. [OC] Data & Tools

      – Data Source: IMDb Non-Commercial Datasets (title.ratings and title.basics).

      – Tools: Python for data processing and analysis. The visualization is done by Matplotlib

      – Context: This analysis explores the statistical rating „floors“ and variance across different movie genres to explain why a 6.5 rating isn’t a universal benchmark for quality.

      Full deep dive and methodology: [https://fezcode.com/blog/what-genre-should-i-watch/?theme=editorial](https://fezcode.com/blog/what-genre-should-i-watch/?theme=editorial)

    2. thegooddoktorjones on

      What sort of psycho goes to IMDB to rate game shows, talk shows, news?

    3. This has already been anecdotally confirmed by comedians and comedy actors, especially comedy actors who also excel in drama.

    4. Horror fan here. Your data doesn’t necessarily prove that it’s easier or harder to make such a film. I read that as there actually just is more poorly made films in the category. Horror certainly is this way.

      I do share the conclusion of lowering standards. I use 50% as a rough cut off within horror, because I’ve pretty much watched all the top shelf stuff, and the tropes repeat so often, I like seeing what oddball stuff people are attempting in lower tier work. Hulu originals are often B at best, but they try interesting new things. Sometimes there’s good content wrapped up in poor cinematography, or poor actors, or poor scripting. But the concept is original.

      Its interesting because I’ve often been disappointed with high ranking comedy. Comedy is the category I seek out the least. I find many movies have a hard time finding the balance of being inherently funny vs shoving the jokes/bits down your throat (this is the joke! laugh right here!). I prefer crafted characters and situations to slapstick and those are hard to come by. In horror, you could replace jokes with jump scares.

      Also, as a general rule, I believe 90% of people don’t review a product unless they’ve had a very bad experience or a very good one. So, I look at the balance of 5 star to 1 star knowing a large percentage of people don’t come back to review if the thing was just fine.

    Leave A Reply