Steam aktualisiert das KI-Offenlegungsformular und verlangt von Entwicklern, sichtbare KI und KI im Spiel zu melden, jedoch keine Hintergrundtools
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Steam-updates-AI-disclosure-form-requiring-developers-to-report-visible-and-in-game-AI-but-not-background-tools.1206103.0.html
9 Kommentare
I mean from a purely practical pov I don’t think Valve could ever have meaningfully policed devs using AI behind the scenes if it isn’t visible in the final product, it’s one of those thing that would have become a crazy witchhunt.
Smart distinction between pre-gen and live-gen AI. Now the real question: how does Valve police live-generated content at scale?
I don’t love this, but I recognize it’s impossible to police this with dev tools, and it otherwise risks making the AI disclosure meaningless. It’s the generated content that is the main issue, so clarifying the rules to focus on that is the right move.
I just hope Valve doesn’t lose their resolve and remove it all together.
[Technofeudalism is their goal and everyone that isn’t a billionaire will all suffer](https://youtu.be/rqR7z2eHOBE?si=HkGzgS6CiX8-GVLY)
Dumb add AI Bring It Back Now: https://open.spotify.com/track/00WiQugup2aQtvYcuhC1Ba?si=2cd8399d72cc4eef
Ok, hypothetical questions. If I were to use ChatGPT to generate concept art and then modeled assets in blender based on that should I have to disclose anything? What if I use ChatGPT to learn how to use Godot?
So let’s see if I understood
1. Vibe coded games don’t need an AI disclosure if they don’t use any AI generated assets.
2. If you trace over AI generated assets by hand no disclosure is needed.
Yeah this is Valve giving in to the AI slop. Guess it was too profitable.
And mention live-gen how? By adding a AI watermark? Wont that ruin the feel while playing the game
If I Google something related to my game development and accidently read the AI summary at the top, did I use ai to make the game?