Im Jahr 1964 machten die Han-Chinesen 94,22 % der Gesamtbevölkerung aus, doch bis 2010 war dieser Wert auf 91,51 % gesunken.
Bis 2020 war der Anteil der Han-Ethnie weiter auf 91,11 % gesunken, und bei Kindern im Alter von 0 bis 4 Jahren machte der Han-Anteil 88,71 % aus und fiel damit unter 90 %. (Viele Menschen in chinesischen sozialen Medien sehen dies als gefährliches Zeichen.)
Von Mediocre_Gift6731
12 Kommentare
I wonder if this have anything to do with decline of Han Chinese, or is that just different methodology used, or just people more willing to report themselves as different East Asian ethnic group – for example due to higher conscious about themselves, or due to nationalism.
Wow that southern peak of non Chinese kinda grow heavily
God blessed Tibet with Mountains and damned the Uyghurs with Oil.
The proportion of Han Chinese in each province in 2020 decreased significantly compared to 2010:
Shanxi: 99.71%→99.65%，-0.06%
Jiangxi: 99.66%→99.51%，-0.15%
Shaanxi: 99.49%→99.44%，-0.05%
Anhui: 99.37%→99.29%，-0.08%
Jiangsu: 99.51%→99.27%，-0.24%
Shandong: 99.24%→99.11%，-0.13%
Henan: 98.80%→98.84%，+0.04%
Shanghai: 98.80%→98.40%，-0.40%
Fujian: 97.84%→97.30%，-0.54%
Tianjin: 97.44%→96.80%，-0.64%
Zhejiang: 98.02%→96.57%，-1.45%
Heilongjiang: 96.42%→96.48%，+0.06%
Guangdong: 97.77%→96.23%，-1.55%
Hebei: 95.98%→95.86%，-0.12%
Beijing: 95.90%→95.20%，-0.70%
Hubei: 95.69%→95.20%，-0.49%
Chongqing: 93.29%→93.23%，-0.06%
Sichuan: 93.90%→93.20%，-0.70%
Jilin: 91.99%→91.33%，-0.66%
Hunan: 90.05%→89.94%，-0.11%
Gansu: 90.57%→89.38%，-1.19%
Liaoning: 84.81%→84.92%，+0.11%
Hainan: 83.33%→84.30%，+0.97%
Inner Mongolia: 79.54%→78.74%，-0.80%
Yunnan: 66.63%→66.88%，+0.25%
Ningxia: 64.58%→64.05%，-0.53%
Guizhou: 63.89%→63.56%，-0.33%
Guangxi: 62.82%→62.48%，-0.34%
Qinghai: 53.02%→50.53%，-2.49%
Xinjiang: 40.10%→42.24%，+2.14%
Tibet: 8.17%→12.15%，+3.98%
The CCP is a atheist govermnet yet they fund many budhist temple in tibet considering its a intrinscate part of their culture
China is using guns and swords to force ethnic minorities to have more children so it doesn’t look like they’re genociding them, and so they can increase their falling population (China’s population will fall to 100 million by the end of the decade)
in some regions the increse of minorities seems too drastic to be natural growth, what’s happening to Guizhou and the region north-east of it?
So, reverse genocide? ROFLMAO
Han ethnicity is quite interesting, its more of a melting pot of dozens if not 100s of cultures Sinicized since the first Han empire cementing its cultural dominance on the eastern continent.
If you ever visit China you will easily notice massive difference in physical apperance in Han people, ecchoes of the ancestors still lingers like that.
is this self identification right? because i don’t think that language and culture of minority are growing
Note that while the percentages have decreased the raw population of Hans has increased between these two dates. The reason the percentages have changed is the one child policy made an exception for ethnic minorities meaning that ethnically Han families were limited to a single child while a Miao family would be allowed anywhere from 2-4 children, perhaps more depending on the size of the minority group (less than 10,000,000 people means less regulation).
Han is not really one ethnicity, just a collection of every ethnicity considered chinese.
Since ethnic minorities were not given the same restrictions as chinese during the one child policy, non chinese ethnic groups will continue to grow as a portion of the population.