Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News

2 Kommentare
Seems like there is a new study every week that shows just how influential guy microbes are. Like they literally control your mood, how you act, what illnesses you get or don’t get, how you look, pretty much everything about how you act on a daily basis.
Makes you wonder who is actually in charge of your body.
Well, I was having a coffee break and here’s what I noticed with this study:
Sex mismatch: the gut microbiota GWAS includes both men and women, but prostate cancer is exclusively male (the authors acknowledge that)
Problem with multiple testing: I think they tested here 473 bacterial taxa and identified 16 as significant at P-value < 0.05.
By chance alone, you’d expect around 24 false positives at this threshold. The reported p-values range from 0.002 to 0.048 -none would survive Bonferoni correction (with a threshold = 0.0001). There’s no mention of FDR correction for the initial screening.
I would say, that the causal claims are overstated given the methodological limitations. The machine learning validation is particularly unconvincing, and the multiple testing issue means many of the 16 identified taxa are likely false positives, I also could not find any heterogeneity statistics (Cochran Q results), leave-one-out sensitivity analyses to name a few.
In summary I would be very careful with taking these results into the clinic…