Von Kriminalität bis hin zu Kulturkriegen ist die Führung von Pierre Poilievre nicht das Einzige, was auf der Tagesordnung des Konservativen Parteitags steht
https://www.thestar.com/politics/from-crime-to-culture-wars-pierre-poilievres-leadership-isnt-the-only-thing-on-the-agenda/article_026ccbb1-ba45-4b1a-953c-3eb21a915172.html
3 Kommentare
This guy needs to get it through his head there is no culture war here. People may disagree about the direction our country is heading and some choices we’ve made but it’s not a cultural thing. For the most part Canadians are pretty united on most issues
ctrl+f „ostriches“ jkjk
The list is a good reminder that our Conservatives are indeed different from American conservatives. It’s also a good reminder that electing them would absolutely be a step towards American conservative policies.
> The only effort to entirely wipe an existing position from the Conservatives’ playbook is a proposal to delete a policy stating that a “Conservative government will not support any legislation to regulate abortion… the grassroots found a “creative” way of putting the issue back on the agenda by framing the existing policy as legitimately inconsistent with other party positions
I bet even Poilievre wishes these guys would just fucking drop it for a few years so the party could stop talking about abortion. Alas, abortion debate is back on the menu, boys!
It will be interesting to see how this stuff votes out.
>One proposal goes a step further in calling to reopen the Canada Health Act to give provinces more insurance options, inspired by countries that have not adopted a single-payer model.
That’s what, United States, China, Pakistan and India? Not exactly places known for their universally accessible healthcare. I suppose there’s also Germany, Netherlands, and Switzerland; but somehow I doubt this proposal would require that private insurers be non-profit.
>One is the “Jordan Peterson Policy,” which states that “no person should have their professional accreditation revoked solely for voicing their opinion or refusing compelled speech.”
So if a medical doctor widely shares their belief that injecting bleach to cure disease is a good idea, they shouldn’t lose their accreditation? Sounds like a terrible policy.
>A new call to “reclaim Canadian sovereignty” by withdrawing from the World Health Organization (WHO) made it to the final list, though Poilievre has said he would not do so.
You know what? Credit to Poilievre here. This is a terrible proposal that would weaken our ability to respond to international health crisis.
And there’s proposals that would bring abortion and conversion therapy back into the political discussion.