Close Menu
    Karten

    Länder, die auf den Grönland-Beacon reagiert haben.


    Länder, die auf den Grönland-Beacon reagiert haben.

    Von TailungFu

    View 37 Comments

    37 Kommentare

    2. AquaSafe1 on

      I have read that Germany will send 13 soldiers, Norway 2 and Sweden a few.

    3. premature_eulogy on

      Finland still sitting on the invitation. I wish we were quicker to act in this case.

    6. BasKabelas on

      NL Here: with trumpets and flare that befits the situation, we announced our navy will support Greenland. After long deliberation and extensive strategy meetings, we decided one hour later to send a singular soldier to Greenland. We love being symbolic, Im sure this officer will do a great job in holding off the imminent Epstein news article diversion operation.

    8. Jlchevz on

      Now that I think of it. What if he and Putin are doing this to split Europe’s forces?

    13. AgreeableLadder6169 on

      German soldier: „I never thought I’d die fighting side by side with a French.”
      French soldier: “What about side by side with a friend?” German soldier: “Aye. I could do that.” 

    18. SAMEHONEYNAMEHONEY on

      good.

      (& good that we’re no sending anyone, let the idiots „deal“ w/ it).

    19. Front_Fill1249 on

      I’m not sure how this is „map porn“ as it’s a fairly misleading graphic, making it seem like there’s substantial deployments instead of a handful of military advisors being sent. Norway isn’t even coloured in.

    20. neutrite on

      These comments are so naive it’s genuinely nauseating and embarrassing for my generation

    23. VASalex_ on

      A lot of the comments are pointing out the troop numbers involved are very small. I think that’s missing the point. The purpose of this isn’t to bring a fighting force capable of resisting the US military into Greenland. European leaders understand well enough that a full-scale military confrontation with the United States would be a catastrophe (we [Europe] would lose).

      The point is that, for America to invade, there’d have to take direct military action against all their closest and powerful military allies. They would either have to kill or imprison French, German, and I believe also British and Canadian soldiers. This massively raises the stakes diplomatically. To directly attack its closest and most important allies would be an irrecoverable disaster for America’s reputation and relationship with its allies in Europe and globally.

    26. Visible_Bar_623 on

      With about…30 troops.

      That’s not enough to be a deterrent. Even a tripwire force needs far more.

    29. Augustus_Chevismo on

      Things will be back to normal in 3 years

      ![gif](giphy|ko4UuHFAOZE3jN3qRB)

    30. KitchenMud5443 on

      NATO countries are all show ponys. Very easy to send troops and fake outrage over Greenland.

      More deaths in Ukraine than the entire population of Greenland. 

    31. Hyperphialos on

      Greece also does that but no one from Europe gives a shit. We have Turkey threatens Greece for decades

    32. True-Apple-4177 on

      This is what Russia wants. A divided West. The USA voters have doomed us all. 

    33. Typical_One5218 on

      Just saying that Cyprus is occupied for half a millennia now you little hypocrites

    34. lavendel_havok on

      I continue to hope that being ordered to attack Denmark is a bridge too far for the US officer corps. I am less hopeful after the nonsense in Venezuela, but there has been a decade long campaign to make Venezuela the enemy. Being ordered to attack people who are those officers friends for no cause will be a big lift.

    36. CruzAderjc on

      I did not have United States going to war with Western Europe on my bingo card for 2026

    Leave A Reply