2,1 Millionen vorübergehende Einwohner werden in diesem Jahr abgelaufene oder auslaufende Aufenthaltsgenehmigungen haben. Aber werden sie Kanada verlassen?

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/windsor/millions-will-have-expired-or-expiring-statuses-in-2026-9.7042698

4 Kommentare

  1. Ov3rReadKn1ght0wl on

    Will they? Probably not. Should they? Absolutely, or else it should jeopardize their chances of PR at all. It was refreshing to read an article on the topic from a lawyer who laid out the essential privilege basis of citizenship. No one has an inherent right to anywhere. There are rules, processes, and discretion exercised by sovereign nations as to who and how many get to come in through immigration avenues. It shouldn’t be a big cognitive jump to realize that, yet in so many articles there’s this underlying sense of entitlement to PR success. I have to say, this was a refreshing read.

  2. Jazzlike_770 on

    Would they? Probably not.
    Will they? Yes, if we ensure:
    * no services are available to those without PR status (airtight checks)
    * No mercy if any crime is committed ( over $5K)

    Our system is lenient at an extreme.

  3. The vast majority will leave on time. Another group will straggle and try to make staying undocumented work, but eventually also leave within a couple years because that life sucks. A smaller portion will stick around long term, but the longer they stay the harder it gets. Your life is basically on hold.

    The problem isn’t going to fix itself, but the majority of temporary migrants coming to Canada would still have a better life back home than thy would be while undocumented here, because we make living without documentation extremely difficult, which is by design, because there are other ways to encourage departure beyond enforcement.

  4. This is a frustrating article. At no point does it attempt to quantify the percentage of temporary residents who overstay their visas, outside of a very rough overall number that is impossible to tie back to the overall population. It makes some claims about asylum applicants, who are a very different population than temporary workers or students.

    The headline frankly feels like fear mongering – to the effect of „4 million Canadians own guns. How many are going to murder people?“ – there’s no effort to link the overall population to the likelihood of the thing the article is speculating about.

Leave A Reply