Poilievre lobt einen Präsidenten, der Demokratien – einschließlich unserer – täglich bedroht
Poilievre praises a president who threatens democracies—including ours—on a daily basis
Poilievre lobt einen Präsidenten, der Demokratien – einschließlich unserer – täglich bedroht
Poilievre praises a president who threatens democracies—including ours—on a daily basis
30 Kommentare
Poilievre doesn’t want to be prime minster, he want to be governor.
I am so glad a majority of Canadians voted sensibly and didn’t vote for this MAGA wannabe
This man must not be allowed to become PM
PP’s he’s always been pro facism. Canada dodged a bullet when he wasn’t elected
Strange that the Freedom cheerleader would embrace fascism…
If anyone is wondering, the article is both upset that the US arrested Maduro while accusing Trump to be just as bad as Maduro.
This article is unhinged nonsense. Stop defending an internationally wanted mass murderer.
I think at least half of his voters would love to join the Yanks. Some for the lower taxes and some for the guns.
Timbit Trump.
Sorry but explain to me again how Poilievre is somehow still relevant after everything that’s happenned to him and his party in the last 12 months?
In case anyone else was wondering, the article leads with PP’s praise of the Maduro abduction.
Just go to therapy for your daddy issues already, Pierre. Jesus.
Lol hill times. Of course these partisan rags are gonna trash pollievre
Praising the totalitarian tangerine is what cost him the election in the first place.
That’s cause Pierre is a loser. Paper boy to debt collector to life time politician / welfare recipient.
Poilievre is irrelevant.
This.
What more does a person need to know about PP than this?
Ah ok. We must be getting an election soon and the Liberals must actually be dropping in the polls. They couldn’t steal their majority so now it’s time to say „Pierre is MAGA and a threat to democracy“ again.
https://idu.org/about/leadership/
https://idu.org/members/
Every Conservative party in pretty much every country is allied with the Republicans.
Yep. He lost me when he used the term fake news
Did he call him „transformative“ and make sure he knew he dressed up in red just for him? Oh, that was the other guy.
‚A conservative never met a Goliath they didn’t embrace.‘
“Down with socialism.”
Says the guy living for free in a publicly funded mansion.
Same views and beliefs folks, dangerous waters
OK… please provide citations
It blows my mind that his followers don’t understand that this is the reason that he didn’t win the election. If only they could criticize PP as much as they blame the „left“ and „woke“ people.
It’s simple: Dictators and power hungry losers always grovel and praise people more powerful.
Poilievre loves fascists. Simple.
> It is true that nobody will miss Maduro, a known dictator who is widely considered to have stolen the election in his country in 2024. But nobody immediately called out Trump for the shocking breach of democracy and international order.
How is taking Maduro – a literal dictator as acknowledged by the writer- a breach of democracy?
Lotta thinkpieces bemoaning the well overdue downfall of Maduro seems to center around the idea that the norms and procedures matter more than the end result. Nevermind that the normal process of a nation riding itself of a dictator usually involves tremendous suffering and bloodletting of the citizenry of that nation.
Pierre Poilievre is not a serious politician.
To anyone lamenting the re-election of the Liberals this is why. PP is a clown who would have already sold us down the river. Just because he isn’t another liberal doesn’t mean he would have been the right choice.
Here’s the thing, it’s entirely possible to recognize that Maduro was an authoritarian piece of shit, but also think that abducting foreign leaders unilaterally sets a bad standard (to say nothing of assuming that this will lead to „freedom“, last I checked the institutions that Chavez established are still in place, the Collectivos are still running the streets looking for dissidents, etc.).
PP’s got the same problem with Israel (has nothing to do with his CIJA connections, I’m sure…). Israel is apparently the „only moral actor“ in the Gaza conflict so their actions are apparently totally fine regardless of what they actually are. He tends to make sweeping „moral“ comments about foreign conflicts based on his Reform bias with no actual understanding of larger situations or IR realities.