Der Vorzeige-Reformrat plant eine Steuererhöhung um fast 4 % – trotz versprochener Steuersenkungen

‘She said the council was in a “very serious financial situation” when it came in, saddled with hundreds of millions of pounds in debt. She added that the latest budget aimed to “stabilise” the local authority’s finances.’

The alternative version of that is:

We couldn’t be fucked checking the council budget before the election despite it being public information and just promised a bunch of bollocks.

Well, well. A bunch of bullshitting amateurs with no plan turn out to be bullshitters with no plan.

You claim you want to make cuts, but you can’t fight the inflationary pressures on social care, education and infrastructure. None of that is getting cheaper unless you want the most vulnerable in society to suffer the cuts.

To quote myself:

>Wouldn’t be surprised if most of them coming in thought they’d easily save billions and balance the budget by slashing various imagined DEI programs only to find out the actual spending on those is a rounding error’s worth. Reminder the average person thinks foreign aid is anywhere between 10% to 20% of the whole budget when it’s actually 0.3%

It’s almost like Kent said that there was a long term insurmountable Local Government Finance problem back in 2019 that couldn’t just be met by „savings“.

They’ve been very open about it. I suspect there is a mix of saying what people want to hear and parachuting in people who don’t know anything about the real world just conservative „haha government is always corrupt and slow“ memes.

We have an issue in politics where memes spouted by „university of life“ types who actually don’t know how a lot of stuff works is treated credibly because the people spouting it are only going to trust solid working class types like themselves, and non dom millionaire gold merchants. And this means people can say nonsense like „there’s red tape and DEI“ without any understanding of anything. When the reality is much like the private sector, it varies, sometimes it’s very efficient.

Even though **the council’s budgets and accounts are publicly available.** And **Kent’s have been deemed „fair and true“ by external auditors.**

For those not aware of why there is a problem with Kent’s finances: It’s children’s services and adults care. Those eat up your entire council tax hike, even the extra bit above inflation. And even then it’s not enough.

We have an ageing population and are getting better at keeping increasingly sick people alive longer not lowering their needs. And in 2012 we had a surge in children’s care referals like you get after an incident like baby P. Except there was no cause. Also instead of tapering off after 6 months it’s still going now.

Kent County Council have been more vocal than most about these problems too. A lot of councils are not looking as far ahead as they have.

There is always an element of error, councils have been asked to make savings for over a decade now and some of their ideas will fail. This does mean that if there’s a smart idea someone has tried it. If it worked well, other councils are probably copying it (Kent were one of the first LAs to create their own internal agency for casual agency staff to cut the middle man out). Local authorities tend to freely share information like that.

They could just take a leaf out of Labours playbook and blame the conservatives for years of neglect.

If it’s good enough for them it should be good enough for reform