Schlagwörter
Aktuelle Nachrichten
America
Aus Aller Welt
Breaking News
Canada
DE
Deutsch
Deutschsprechenden
Global News
Internationale Nachrichten aus aller Welt
Japan
Japan News
Kanada
Karte
Karten
Konflikt
Korea
Krieg in der Ukraine
Latest news
Map
Maps
Nachrichten
News
News Japan
Polen
Russischer Überfall auf die Ukraine seit 2022
Science
South Korea
Ukraine
Ukraine War Video Report
UkraineWarVideoReport
United Kingdom
United States
United States of America
US
USA
USA Politics
Vereinigte Königreich Großbritannien und Nordirland
Vereinigtes Königreich
Welt
Welt-Nachrichten
Weltnachrichten
Wissenschaft
World
World News
4 Kommentare
>“The pertinent issue is the solicitor’s comment, ‚Typical SPSC behaviour‘ and the association between the SPSC and the supposed act of vandalism in the post. The post was made by the alias Stevie Harrison,“ the society said
…
>Berlow claimed on Sunday the plot had been a sting in order to catch someone who had ben stalking him.
>“Unfortunately I made it too real and named an organisation I shouldn’t have. It wasn’t my intention to blame the SPSC for a fictitious event,“ said Berlow.
Even the apology is implausible and underhanded. How someone like this is able to continue to practice law is disturbing.
I wish I could find any reporting of this story that wasn’t from an obviously-partisan source.
ETA: As far as I can tell, it relates to this disciplinary case from 2024: [https://www.lawscot.org.uk/members/journal-hub/articles/read-the-latest-decision/](https://www.lawscot.org.uk/members/journal-hub/articles/read-the-latest-decision/)
According to that, he did not stage a graffiti attack to frame the group, he linked them to someone else’s post about a graffiti attack, knowing that it was false.
Has anyone got a proper source?
https://www.newarab.com
This is clearly dated 2020, why is this being reposted as if it were new?