Share.

    8 Kommentare

    1. CircumspectCapybara on

      In case you’re wondering, yes, that means your ChatGPT chats and user data. All of it in the past, present, and future (for the duration of this case) cannot be deleted—even if you request your data be deleted, e.g., in an exercise of your CCPA or GDPR rights—and has to be preserved because it’s all subject to legal hold.

      Blame the judge for ordering such a sweeping ruling in plaintiff’s favor because they were too lazy to sit down and enumerate what specific data is in scope for the purposes of discovery for this suit, and what should be out of scope. They just said, „Screw it, just give NYT everything. All the chats, all the user data, past or present or future, regardless of criteria or nature.“

      Obviously, the court should never have granted such a sweeping, overly broad request.

    2. You ain’t getting me this time coppers. Refused public AI from the start. Self-hosted or bust. Sovereign data.

    3. AvailableReporter484 on

      Does this mean congress will have access to the numerous gay fan fictions I asked it to create of the flintstones meet the transformers? Because that’s just supposed to be for me 😫

    4. lol nah.

      it not private and you can track back who did what and with what.

      this companies in the case want to og data that can be re put together easy ,will data farm/sell said data if possible.

    5. Serious-Birthday8026 on

      I once asked chatGPT to explain the OSI model in terms of pro wrestling and I think it’d be funny if a judge had to read that.

    6. finallytisdone on

      Fucking absurd. If you’re going to call out the Supreme Court for making ass hat rulings that make no sense, then you are a hypocrite if you don’t call this out as well. It’s an absurd overreach that violates privacy and basically gives a company an impossible task.

    Leave A Reply