This is good if they don’t go too far. As a kid I read some inappropriate stuff. , some of it mandatory.
Motor-Pomegranate831 on
Yet another copy of the nightmare down south.
ComplexWrangler1346 on
Ugh
the_normal_person on
> Both divisions refused requests to reveal the list of pulled materials. Smith said the Edmonton Public School Board’s list is an “internal document.”
This is all useless to comment on unless I see the list of books here. Both ‘sides’ of this debate use so much willful ignorance here.
Opponents claim that this is being used to ban anything that even tangentially mentions gay or trans people, which proponents deny. While proponents point to a few actual crazy cases where educators are strangely committed to keeping books essentially teach young kids how to have drugs and sex with weird explicit images, which opponents deny is the case here.
Which one is it in Alberta? This debate is so cooked and politically charged I have literally no idea and refuse to believe anything either side says until I can see the list of banned books for myself.
Ok-Trainer3150 on
A good article. Notice that names of removed books are being kept secret by the boards Involved. That’s an outrage in a free society. Time to root out those titles that have been removed and publicly name them.
Mue_Thohemu_42 on
What we teach our children should reflect our values as parents and families, not those of fringe political activists.
Onterrible_Trauma on
More insanity from the Maple MAGA crowd.
LaFs14 on
“They don’t gotta burn the books they just remove ‘em”
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
8 Kommentare
This is good if they don’t go too far. As a kid I read some inappropriate stuff. , some of it mandatory.
Yet another copy of the nightmare down south.
Ugh
> Both divisions refused requests to reveal the list of pulled materials. Smith said the Edmonton Public School Board’s list is an “internal document.”
This is all useless to comment on unless I see the list of books here. Both ‘sides’ of this debate use so much willful ignorance here.
Opponents claim that this is being used to ban anything that even tangentially mentions gay or trans people, which proponents deny. While proponents point to a few actual crazy cases where educators are strangely committed to keeping books essentially teach young kids how to have drugs and sex with weird explicit images, which opponents deny is the case here.
Which one is it in Alberta? This debate is so cooked and politically charged I have literally no idea and refuse to believe anything either side says until I can see the list of banned books for myself.
A good article. Notice that names of removed books are being kept secret by the boards Involved. That’s an outrage in a free society. Time to root out those titles that have been removed and publicly name them.
What we teach our children should reflect our values as parents and families, not those of fringe political activists.
More insanity from the Maple MAGA crowd.
“They don’t gotta burn the books they just remove ‘em”