Großbritannien und Frankreich würden im Falle eines Friedensabkommens Truppen in die Ukraine schicken, sagt Starmer nach den Gesprächen in Paris

And Russia can say that it won’t allow that all it wants – it’s none of their business.

Anyone who brings out the whole ‚it’ll cAusE eScalAtion!!‘ – what the hell has Russia been doing the last four years? they literally brought North Korea into the fold and that alone was an escalation in itself.

Unless you’re pro-Russian, this should be welcomed by everybody.

Honestly believe this is a mistake. As part of a bigger coalition? Sure, but so far only the uk and france have said yes. Everyone else are offering nothing.

Im sure this has been stated multiple times over the last year. Not news, just a bunch of old men flexing at each other. We should just make world leaders fight to their deaths.

Good.

Curiously no other European countries have said they would do the same, yet, but from a certain point of view it doesn’t matter the UK and France in this instance are the only ones of any importance due to both being Nuclear powers. If the rest of Europe wants to continue to hide, bark or toothlessly bite under the NATO nuclear shield then let them.

The presence of British and French troops in a future Ukrainian rump state would, in a sane world with sane leaders with principle and backbone, guarantee no conflict unless the Russian oligarchy would start nuclear armageddon. Bringing Ukraine in whatever form under the NATO nuclear umbrella would guarantee their political independence so much as so they wanted to remain independent.

The major issue with this point of view of course is that we don’t live in a sane world anymore and more and more countries seem to be led by increasingly insane leaders *ahem USA. I guess one has to hope that if the commies didn’t blow up the world way back then the oligarchs, paedos and crime lords won’t either.

Starmer’s son first, flood blood can come from his child, he is quite willing to spill our children’s blood.

Has anybody bothered to ask if British soldiers want to go and fight other politicians wars on foreign soil?

Is the British army now a kind of „Rent a mob“ up for hire to the highest bidder?

Boots on the ground. I thought that was considered a no no.

I have no major issue with Starmer but he’s not the man for the job now. We really need a more steely nerved politician who is willing to take some radical decisions both domestically and abroad.

Starmer and Macron have announced this, what, 4
four times already in the last year?

Maybe they think its makes them look tough and statesmanlike.

As always no nato troops are going to Ukraine unless putin agrees. Putin does not agree. So it’s a no go.

Why is this even a headline on the news?

Britain won’t send troops, it will topple the Labour Party, already the UK military has stated they don’t have the men equipment or logistics half the troops will put their papers in, labour is hated in the UK and starmer is, a walking dead prime minister. BS from two finished politicians.