Share.

    34 Kommentare

    1. why not start it from ww2 then, they invaded both Poland and Finland (outside Axis forces) in order to steal land and kill and ethnically cleanse them, and Belarus is still theirs state basically

      Also let’s not forget they allied with Hitler too

      also stole land from Japan after ww2

      completely destroyed Chechenia too

    2. Didn’t they send their army to suppress the riots in Kazakhstan? It seems pretty direct to me

    3. hutt_with_diarrhea on

      LMAO at the former Eastern bloc countries not being included in this map

    4. I mean the Soviet Union helping liberation movements in Africa and Asia wasn’t a bad thing. I would be more interested in the conflicts of the post 1991 Federation

    5. I would put Hungary in red, they literally sent in 17 divisions and killed 20000 people

    6. Wilsonj1966 on

      There has also been hardly any wars since without T55s and AKs. The US does a lot of weapons exports, worth a huge amount of money but the Soviet Union exported a huge volume

    7. viburnumjelly on

      Russia never „intervened“ in China. The two countries did indeed have a conflict over an island in the Ussuri River, but it was Soviet territory at the time, and it was China that attempted to intervene. It’s like saying that Cuba „started a direct conflict“ with the USA in Bay of Pigs. After the incident, the two sides agreed that the border there should be reevaluated, and Russia later voluntarily ceded the territory in 1991 as part of improving relations between the two countries.

    8. first time i’ve seen a user posting these *^((rather ill-sourced))* maps doesn’t seem to have a nationalist agenda in doing so

    9. tHrow4Way997 on

      There should be another category for Hybrid Warfare – pretty much the entire world would be lit up with that one, particularly any country currently experiencing a surge in radical right wing politics.

    10. AdeptResident8162 on

      what’s your point? ussr and us were the only two super power for half century. they have toppled many democratic and authoritarian governments.

    11. FrostingGrand1413 on

      I know its casually convenient to conflate Russia/the russian federation and the USSR, but like, they aren’t the same political entity. A bunch of those shaded areas were literally part of the USSR, and given the map doesn’t bother to date anything, that all just seems needlessly messy and confusing.

      (P.S. absolutely not a Putin apologist, man’s a war criminal/murderer/embarrasing insecure macho buffoon, and should tried at the hague, but, details do matter)

    12. ParamedicMedical3548 on

      What about India 1971? I would think that’s an indirect intervention no?

    13. GovernmentBig2749 on

      The USSR didnt exist in the same timeline as Serbia and Kosovo as independent states, so no

    14. I don’t think that the Polish would agree with this map… They let Hitler ravage it only to conquer it after.

    15. ResultRecent6254 on

      „Indirect interventions“ apparently are decolonization movements in africa. What?

    16. So we just are going to ignore all intervention in the western hemisphere supporting communist revolutionaries?

    Leave A Reply