Im Jahr 2026 endet für Zehntausende Arbeitnehmer im öffentlichen und privaten Sektor die Möglichkeit der Fernarbeit
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-remote-work-option-ending-for-tens-of-thousands-of-public-private/
Im Jahr 2026 endet für Zehntausende Arbeitnehmer im öffentlichen und privaten Sektor die Möglichkeit der Fernarbeit
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-remote-work-option-ending-for-tens-of-thousands-of-public-private/
26 Kommentare
The new year will bring some big changes to the rules on in-office work for many employees across the country — including tens of thousands of provincial government staff in Ontario and Alberta who will soon be required back in the office full-time.
As of Jan. 5, Ontario provincial government employees will be expected to work in the office five days a week.
Alberta’s public service is also returning to full-time, in-office work in February to “strengthen collaboration, accountability and service delivery for Albertans,” a spokesperson for the Alberta government said.
While several provinces, including Manitoba, British Columbia and New Brunswick, retain more flexible hybrid work rules, others are reviewing their policies.
A spokesperson for the government of Newfoundland and Labrador said the province is looking at its remote work policy.
The government of the Northwest Territories is also reviewing its remote work policy, though a spokesperson said there are no plans to require employees to return to the workplace on-site five days a week.
It’s still not clear when federal public servants will have to increase their office presence, or by how much. Prime Minister Mark Carney promised last month that a plan would soon come into “sharper view.”
If a job can be done reliably at home I see no need to make people go to the office.
I hate this and I can’t work from home. Keep people off the roads
Best option here is to offer reduced pay as a benefit for WFH baked into employment contracts.
Reduces the cost of the public service, reduces commuter congestion, keeps the same money in the workers pocket. Wins all around.
It’s always about propping up commercial R/E value, „productivity“ is just a smoke screen.
Ah well. No more getting chores done while on the clock.
Going up to 5 days a week in downtown Ottawa with terrible transit + years long wait lists for monthly parking passes = an extra $200 easily just in parking fees alone. Guess my New Year’s resolution will be learning to bike 30km one way to work to save some money.
This govt is such clowns
We have solutions to the problems we face and governments of all stripes refuse them.
Imagine how nice the traffic would be if more people worked from home.
I’m pretty sure RTO mandates were dictated by big oil lobbyists, arguing for a bigger GDP even if no one benefits from all the wasted time in traffic and burnt fuels. Gas prices will definitely blow up again if we’re returning to office.
Psychopaths in power.
And that’s how rush hour chaos begun.
I can only speak for my own experience but I personally prefer a hybrid model. There are days where I can be more productive at home but it’s not all the time, there are other times where being able to meet with people and collaborate without having to always set up a scheduled call leads to better outcomes.
I feel my company struck a good balance. They don’t prescribe specific days but they say that we are not a fully remote environment and the expectation is that you’re spending the majority of your time with your teams and clients. That means 3x a week as a standard in office and 2 remote days, but it’s not being monitored and enforced except for problem scenarios.
Most people at work I talk to about it say they like the balance. But then again it’s a sales and client service job so if you wanted to isolate yourself away from people it’s not the job for you anyway.
If you needed more convincing that the big bad corporate world sees you as nothing more than a number, this is it.
This is actually deranged.
Who wants this aside from some downtown developers?
You’d think that having to spend less money on office space would make companies want to keep people WFH. I’m guessing that while some people thrived in a WFH environment, many more actually became *less* productive.
And I get it. I briefly did WFH for a Healthcare company in the states and boy was it distracting. A lot of my coworkers were straight up leaving the house to go run errands while on the clock
As per usual the media does zero research on the massive cost of this:
1.5 billion in renovating a single building:
https://www.thestar.com/politics/provincial/the-1-5-billion-renovation-of-ontario-s-civil-service-headquarters-is-over-budget-and/article_d60ada7f-994a-4426-a833-c53f4e1dcbb1.html
$300 million on a single lease:
https://www.thestar.com/business/canada-pension-plan-investment-board-to-spend-estimated-300-million-plus-on-its-lavish-new/article_aa66dab4-63ab-11ef-87d1-0b24bd9c1bea.html
20:05:00 timestamp – the PSPC spends 2.2 billion every year on 6million sq feet of office space and 1 million square feet of warehousing:
https://senparlvu.parl.gc.ca/Harmony/en/PowerBrowser/PowerBrowserV2?fk=637484&globalStreamId=3&fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR0t62-cCMhXnNUgxrO7iG5wt5S8pE2NaHXUH3fo9AaJax8IMg-BGLNNDUo_aem_AU4JTN3XmQGc91aFtzlW0ZD6FfrsQryHX-RuhNcAIAN5bVRe2FPibPc_RlMAWoQN-X53iv4EewNIE-hmJKlmZPy_#in
14million already spent on a new CRA office building in NL without a shovel in the ground. Once work is complete 50 to 100 million:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/newfoundland-labrador/new-cra-building-update-1.7085028
this is only a random redditor doing bare minimum google searches. there are countless other costs with leases being bought with no media coverage.
Not only would this save billions but they already now they could create 50,000 homes converting these buildings while saving money:
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-federal-office-buildings-apartments/
This money was spent with no cost benefit analysis by the government as proven by ATIPs:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/remote-work-office-government-1.7332191
the purse strings of government just „coincidentally“ opened 30 days after being openly lobbied by private businesses asking to the subsidized by the government:
https://chamber.ca/news/its-time-for-governments-to-bring-public-sector-employees-back-to-the-office-a-letter-from-canadas-business-community/?doing_wp_cron=1767374626.5591859817504882812500
This is wide scale government fraud. Simple as that. The government is asking people to slow down in the office, do less work(they officially removed productivity and costs savings from their remote work exemption list and refuse to review productivity) so they can give billions of dollars to specific wealthy business owners.
If you were hired for an office job, then your job is in the office. If you were hired for a WFH job then your job is at home. If you were hired for a field job then your job is in the field. If your employer allows a hybrid model for certain positions then that’s great, but it’s not an entitlement.
People should keep in mind, if you can do your job from home (in North America), an Indian can and will do your job from India for a quarter of your salary (or less).
No one should report. F em.
If you are forced back to the office, quiet quit. Let the productivity fall low enough that they realize forcing people to commute when they don’t have to will actually be costly for the company. It’s so frustrating that we all won’t just band together and make some demands. Profits stop if we stop. Let’s USE that.
This is a Canadian Press article which can be accessed without paywall at their website.
[Canadian Press article. ](https://www.thecanadianpressnews.ca/prairies_bc/alberta/remote-work-option-ending-for-thousands-of-public-private-sector-workers-in-2026/article_9f80e4ee-43cc-5962-b8bd-86f78a549cf5.html)
The government can’t possibly say we have environmental objectives if they make people travel back to offices.
$240/month for parking is after tax money, so really $400/month earned money.
Mention not the GHG causing climate disasters leading to increased insurance premiums.
But we have to save the commercial office landlords, investors and stock market.
Having spent almost a decade working from home I see both sides of the discussion. Unfortunately for Government workers, the original job was in office with WFH coming into play during COVID.
I suspect the main reason is that for every dedicated employee there was one who wasn’t productive or even available when they were supposed to be. Rather than deal with these problem employees it’s easier just to make everyone return to the office.
God forbid working people can have increased work life balance and a few extra dollars in their bank account. This just proves we only exist to spend money. Buy that coffee! Pay for daily transit!
Good.