Share.

    45 Kommentare

    1. HumanWhiteShrek on

      It can be real depending on your definition but for that to be true your definition must be regarded

    2. WicasaNapayshni on

      maybe no separate souls

      your deceased loved one’s personalities or egos in a heaven somewhere, comforting but silly

      looking inside the brain for consciousness is like looking inside a radio for the musician

    3. Substantial-Dream-14 on

      It’s like pointing to your cells and saying that it’s you. 

    4. Training_Loss5449 on

      That’s Hinduism. You god iam god that rock is god the birds are god everything is god

    5. Sweaty_Challenge_649 on

      God doesn’t exist in the way we think. Hid is a construct built to answer questions that never had an answer

    6. Reasonable_Cod_5643 on

      Defining the word god as everything is just boring if everything is god nothing is god

    7. theworldiseviill on

      Maybe this world is like some kind of test.. this full world and we are circulating in it… And the one who is like good and cracked it is able to get out… Or maybe something like that..but I have a very strong feeling regarding this .. according to my religion I can conclude this thing..

    8. If i make a simulation and create the world/ environment/ creatures… am i God of that simulation?  Because I’m pretty sure that is what is happening to us right now. 

    9. ScantilyCladDad69 on

      I don’t think so, because that would mean that the lead singer of LostProphets is also God…

    10. Consistent_Ad_687 on

      Everything is made of God. But it is not “God”. Panentheism. It seems to be we live in a non material reality. Perhaps within Gods mind.

    11. The term „God“ is a generic term used to define a host of beings, phenomena, and states across many cultures (Foregoing the obvious argument that the organization of the letters into the signifiers of the sounds g-o-d is strictly an English convention and therefore only carries meaning in an English-speaking context and therefore can only be „real“ for English-speaking audience but not n“Real“ in the sense of the absolute, which may be implied but is not actually specified). So until the artist defines specifically what they mean by the term „GOD“ in the context presented, the question can not, with anything beyond the commenters own imagined definition of what the artist meant when they labeled these diagrams „GOD“.

      Alternately, and this would be a valid question, you can define how you interrupt what this diagram means and ask if your interpolation is „Real or not“. But, and this will be the most vital part, you will have to provide a complete definition of what you mean by the term „GOD“ so that other can then offer some thoughtful comment.

    12. MassiveBagOfChips on

      No.

      Everything that has a beginning has a cause. Everything in the universe including the universe itself has a beginning.

      God (as commonly defined by most) has no beginning or cause, but is the creator and cause. Therefore these items that had a beginning and cause are not God.

      I dont mean you have to believe in God to accept this image is incorrect. Just that you would have to change the commonly accepted definition/understanding of God.

    13. I mean God and Dog are opposites. Evil is Live and Xanax remains Xanax. And abracadabra I’m stupid. Bye.

    Leave A Reply