Close Menu
    Politics

    Warum verfolgte das DOJ einen investigativen Journalisten, der über Epstein berichtete? Die Demokraten fordern Antworten


    Warum verfolgte das DOJ einen investigativen Journalisten, der über Epstein berichtete? Die Demokraten fordern Antworten

    https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/epstein-files-doj-julie-brown-flight-b2891476.html

    Share.
    View 19 Comments

    19 Kommentare

    1. pinkTeats on

      What else? To redact him and whatever he has on their Cult Leader. If that is not obvious, I wonder what else is

    2. Ace-Cuddler on

      So, during his first term, Trump’s DOJ was tracking a journalist who helped expose Epstein’s heinous crimes. Why was it necessary to keep such close tabs on her? How many other journalist did they track? How many journalists are being tracked right now during his second term? We need answers.

    3. blade944 on

      The bigger question is who else was, and probably still are, being tracked and surveilled by the Trump regime.

    4. xocutiepiexoxo on

      DOJ tracking a reporter feels like the political justice version of bro, were just friends!“ you keep insisting it’s normal, but every sane person is just staring at you like🤔

    6. space_cow_girl on

      I wonder if they are also tracking the hundreds of Epstein’s trafficking victims that this journalist has spoken with. 

    9. blackmobius on

      Because they (the doj a d white house) were worried about some of epsteins contacts and friends getting discovered during the reporting.

      Namely, the sitting president at the time.

      Now it all makes sense why they kept closer tabs on the people investigating Epstein rather than say, idk, helping victims, or bringing prosecution to his accomplices.

    10. DinklyDingle on

      Because if they found something juicy, they would have had an accident. Free press, lol

    11. AdvancedTurnip8680 on

      My guess is it goes back to catch and kill to buy exclusive rights for bad press stories and then never run the stories.

    14. The-Questcoast on

      I really hope that if the Dems regain power, they prosecute these criminals. I do NOT want to hear “It is time to move on and heal as a country.”

    15. rounder55 on

      The official oversight account run by Dems tweeted the DOJ needs to answer questions. They should be showing up at their doors to bring coverage to this. A tweet won’t do shit unfortunately. Not that my pitch will, but I think it’d get the coverage it deserves at least

    16. Phewelish on

      The trump mob famiily is using the DOJ as its personal watchdog to intimidate people from pursuing their illegal activities.

      its nothing to see here…move along.l

    17. R-Dragon_Thunderzord on

      Remember when Republicans demanded answers too, like, 9 months ago? Pepperidge Farm remembers.

    18. wrosecrans on

      This is the general category of thing I knew would come out with the release, even though the Trump administration thought they were being clever with the malicious compliance to block out Trump mentions. Whenever you get a big enough dump of documents, you get some stuff like this that nobody knows they need to cover up because it seems super obscure at a glance. But somebody looks at it and goes, „huh, that’s slightly odd.“ And once the right person sees what it is, it opens up a ton of followup questions that an investigator can pull at and connect to people who thought they were off the radar.

      It’s like „they got Capone on taxes.“ There will be memos, paper trails, probably warrants, emails, all sorts of stuff that are connected to why the government included info about this one flight in the Epstein documents dump, and that stuff will unlock details about the cover/interference campaign and who exactly was driving it and how.

    Leave A Reply