Share.

    11 Kommentare

    1. SuperSecretAgentMan on

      Hammer Salesman Suggests Your Problem Could Be Fixed With A Hammer.

    2. This is not a bad idea. Billions were spent making US Naval reactors safe and efficient while quickly throttling up and down. They are also damage resistant and compact.

      But saying they will use naval reactor designs isn’t a complete green light. The Navy is not a for-profit organization. They don’t cut corners. Actual US naval reactors are guarded by marines, and maintained by some of the best trained and most disciplined people in the industry. Would the same be true in the for-profit data center industry?

    3. HalepenyoOnAStick on

      Navy nuclear reactors use weapons grade uranium as a fuel source.

      There is no way they will ever make a military grade reactor in the civilian sector.

      They are so expensive compared to normal reactors as well.

      The navy needs reactors that can be taken from idle power loads to max power in a couple of minutes. So you can do things like go from slow to fast on a big ass boat.

      But civilian reactors can take hours to raise and lower power. But this is good because they’re very efficient and use very low enriched fuels.

      Also the DOE is not giving billionaires weapons grade uranium. Ever. This is a good thing.

    4. free_is_free76 on

      If we want AI, we need reliable cheap clean energy. Nuclear delivers.

    5. initial-algebra on

      How about building nuclear power capacity but not wasting it all on chatbots?

    6. Nervous-Ad-3761 on

      Definitely give the AI access to a nuclear power grid. Sounds like a great idea.

    Leave A Reply