Close Menu
    Politics

    Der Oberste Gerichtshof hindert Trump daran, die Nationalgarde nach Chicago zu entsenden


    Der Oberste Gerichtshof hindert Trump daran, die Nationalgarde nach Chicago zu entsenden

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/12/23/politics/supreme-court-blocks-trump-national-guard-chicago?utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=missions&utm_source=reddit

    Share.
    View 38 Comments

    38 Kommentare

    1. cnn on

      The Supreme Court on Tuesday barred President Donald Trump from deploying the National Guard to Chicago to protect ICE agents, handing the White House a rare loss at the high court as the president has sought to send troops to multiple American cities.

      “At this preliminary stage, the government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the court said in its unsigned order.

      Conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the opinion.

    2. blues111 on

      Holy shit? Something good for once?

      „At this preliminary stage, the government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois“

    3. Vadion on

      „Ah shit guys, the dam is breaking and the docs are trickling out, we’d better hedge our bets now while we still can and start ruling against this guy“ ACB probably

      And then they still didn’t listen to ACB, because woman so the Prime Jagoffs dissented lol

    4. LuinAelin on

      What’s the reason they’re trying to use to justify sending the national guard to Chicago

    6. pontiacfirebird92 on

      I mean, SCOTUS is also going to overturn Humphrey’s Executor and crown Trump as King of all of the United States so what does this matter? They’re also on track to overturn birthright citizenship and gut the Voting Rights Act. They’ve already signaled their intent to elevate Trump to supreme ruler of the nation so what does this matter?

    8. KingMario05 on

      Best Christmas present I’ve gotten all year. Now throw the dissenters off, please. This *should have been* 9-0 against. Clear abuse of power.

    9. steve_ample on

      Good. Makes it a bit tougher for him to deploy the military for another Jan 20 type event. That was one major missing piece for Trump for what happened in 2020 – the insurrectionists were a major but an irregular force.

    10. herewegoagain1024 on

      The Supreme Court throws us a bone every now and then to try and save face

    11. Starks on

      That’s a strange outcome. With this wording, it seems to imply that the president either must invoke the insurrection act or simply does not have the authority to violate posse comitatus in the first place. Going even further, mentioning regular forces being first before the guard is a scary implication.

    12. meatball402 on

      One day, he’s going to send troops to the Supreme court after they do their annual „rule against trump“

    14. indigocherry on

      So…he’s just going to do it anyway, right? Just like everything else he’s been told not to do?

    15. jaron_b on

      Why is it that the party of small government continuously tries to invade cities within its country?

    16. TheChrisCrash on

      Trump’s plan – do it anyway. Wait for the ruling or the lawsuit. Deploy them somewhere else. Repeat.

    17. CAM6913 on

      Of course the most corrupt justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch dissented from the opinion. Treasonous trump will either not listen and keep the NG there or find another way to terrorize Chicago and kidnap people

    18. voice_of_Sauron on

      ICE are the invaders and should not be there. Remove ICE and there is no need to protect them.

    19. barcham22 on

      They’ll give him a much bigger win for something else instead. We’ve seen this show enough times.

    20. Farabee on

      SCOTUS has finally figured out that rubber-stamping this wannabe dictator’s tantrums is only going to bring them down with his flaming, sinking ship.

    24. Demonking3343 on

      I’m not going to lie I’m actually surprised they didn’t give him a blank check.

    25. FuzzyAd9407 on

      >What if, Kavanaugh hypothesized, an angry crowd gathered outside a federal court house threatening to storm the building

      They werent fucking useful for jan 6th because of the president. History shows that it doesnt matter if the president has the power because of political bias in the actual use of powers.

    26. GirasoleDE on

      > Alito, joined by Thomas, wrote that he “strongly” disagreed with the way the court dealt with the case.
      >
      >“The court fails to explain why the president’s inherent constitutional authority to protect federal officers and property is not sufficient to justify the use of National Guard members in the relevant area for precisely that purpose,” Alito wrote. “I am not prepared at this point to express a definite view on these questions, but I have serious doubts about the correctness of the court’s views.”

      *[Donald Trump, Donald Trump, der hat immer recht…](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lied_der_Partei)*

    27. rat_penis on

      …long after he deployed the national guard to Chicago.

      He’s living proof its easier to ask for forgiveness than permission, and he doesnt ask for forgiveness.

    28. CogentCogitations on

      „Nothing in today’s ruling detracts from that core agenda“

      Oh good, so you admit you were deploying the National Guard for no purpose. Seems like something you would not want to say when there are still lawsuits regarding illegal National Guard deployments.

    29. Steve120988 on

      lol a group of hacks trying to save face. What a time line to be alive. Nonsensical ruling that we can’t beleive was actually made

    30. TheCaptainDamnIt on

      Oh good news!

      [Reads article] Jesus Christ there is no amount of authoritarianism Alito will not support!

    31. ToadP on

      So except for the hardest of Criminals on the court, the more closer to the middle and by closer it’s like a few centimeters closer, finally realized that the pedo in chief is done for at this point so they are trying to save themselves from the Trumptanic as it is taking on water from the Iceberg files that have just ripped it open.

    36. Jamizon1 on

      “This is a significant repudiation of President Trump’s efforts to use federal troops to supplement immigration enforcement especially in Democratic-led jurisdictions,”

      The -real~ repudiation will occur after the mid-terms. The republicans are going to lose the house, effectively hobbling Trump’s agenda.

      The race to complete these AI data centers will not occur in time for them to completely brainwash the masses with misinformation. The damage is done. Too many people have been negatively affected by this administration’s policies and blatant disregard for the rule of law and the will of the people.

      AI is largely unpopular, and its integration into almost every facet of modern life is being met with monumental pushback and skepticism.

      These money drunk oligarchs are going to find out just how badly they’ve miscalculated the will of the American people.

      I hope…

    38. LagerthaFreya on

      I’ve been to Chicago twice since he sent the TX national guard. It’s been a colossal waste of tax dollars to support this disgusting example of performative politics. Why do they take camera crews everywhere in the ‚burbs, but stay away from high-crime areas? And what about his hotel discharging way more waste than allowed into the river that the state and city have worked hard to rehabilitate? So thankful SCOTUS finally said NO!

    Leave A Reply