Share.

    9 Kommentare

    1. denyer-no1-fan on

      If someone chants „Death to the Russian Army“ no one is going to complain, so why is a genocidal army receiving a more favourable treatment by the media class?

    2. > „We sought specific consideration around the words stated, in terms of the intent behind them, the wider context of how people heard what was said, case law and anything else potentially relevant, including freedom of speech,“ the statement continued.

      > „Consistently the advice we have received has highlighted fundamental evidential difficulties that cannot be ignored,“ police said.

      > „We believe it is right this matter was comprehensively investigated, every potential criminal offence was thoroughly considered, and we sought all the advice we could to ensure we made an informed decision.“

      > „We have proactively engaged with a number of groups, particularly among our Jewish communities, since this incident and provided updates to them throughout.“

      What a wonderful use of police resources…

    3. Translation: Incitement to violence is fine so long as it’s Jews in the cross hairs.

    4. so if we’re keeping score, that’s investigation ended over glastonbury, investigation ended over boardmasters, and suing RTE over how they portrayed it.

      Did I miss any?

    5. Absolute waste of police time, I’m glad nothing came of it at least though.

    6. Quick-Taste4204 on

      Well that’s been an absolute recognisable waste of police forces!! It wasn’t threatening a person! It was a wish against a horribly violent aggressor!!

    7. So basically, they couldn’t make out the offences as you can’t say wishing death upon a foreign army can be linked to the hatred of a protected characteristic. Didn’t need a large investigation to tell you that.

    Leave A Reply