Eine Epstein-Akte wurde zweimal veröffentlicht, redigiert und unredigiert, sodass wir genau sehen können, was sie verheimlichten. Ich habe jedes Wort, das ursprünglich redigiert wurde, mit einem roten Kästchen versehen.

    Von RunDNA

    Share.

    4 Kommentare

    1. Submission statement: Comparing the two files shows us what they are censoring. It reveals what they didn’t want us to know.

      Sources:

      [The redacted and unredacted pages side by side.](https://imgur.com/a/nueeQjW)

      [The Justice Department webpage where the files appear.](https://www.justice.gov/epstein/court-records/giuffre-v-maxwell-no-115-cv-07433-sdny-2015)

      Direct links to the two pdf files:

      [1296-17.pdf](https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1296-17.pdf)

      [1332-16.pdf](https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Giuffre%20v.%20Maxwell,%20No.%20115-cv-07433%20(S.D.N.Y.%202015)/1332-16.pdf)

      Note: the unredacted pages are mostly but not completely unredacted. I wonder what is under the remaining black bars.

    2. Aggressive_Chair1470 on

      there’s a huge amount of documents and images with redacted and unredacted versions 

    3. These_Finding6937 on

      It’s almost like more people should’ve listened during the 2016 GOP primaries when I was screaming from the roof tops that Trump and Clinton were in cahoots and he was a deep state plant to seize total control of both parties.

    Leave A Reply