Bemerkenswerte Ostafrikaner sind Rishi Sunak, Zohran Mamdani und Kash Patel
Zu den Südafrikanern gehört: Tyla Laural Seethal
Zu den Karibischen gehört: Nicki Minaj
It’s not slavery if we don’t call it slavery mindset
[deleted] on
[deleted]
Resident-Weekend-291 on
I had a 5th gen Indopak friend from Mombasa, Kenya
polishedrelish on
None in Australia?
Brilliant_Market1011 on
They were paid contracted workers, not slaves. In most cases they begged to be allowed to stay instead of going back to India after their contracts expired.
Pale_Consideration87 on
Half of the diaspora mixed with black population, that’s why people talk about it less. The identity is diluted
For example, Kamala Harris, Nicki Minaj, tyla are results of this mix.
Virtual-Release1079 on
Indian try not to play the victim challenge: Impossible
MetroBS on
There is a massive and discernible difference between slavery and indentured servitude
doublereload on
Seems to be missing the Indians brought to modern day Myanmar. Many Indians are 3rd or 4th generation Myanmar born and still seen as second class citizens here as a result.
Flocculencio on
Rishi and Zohran’s East African Indian roots are in the wealthy mercantile community not the indentured labour groups. There are very much class and caste issues at play.
JG134 on
What about Suriname? Or is that included in British Guyana or Trinidad?
CoolAfternoon2340 on
Indentured labour ≠ Slavery
ThatMessy1 on
Indentured servants =/= slaves.
VaccineMachine on
Lovely to see the OP block me for posting things that prove this wrong.
thatkoboldhero on
I worked in two pharmacies as a technician and one colleague from one pharmacy was a person of Indian descent from Fiji and another person from another pharmacy was a person of Indian descent from Guyana.
Mysterious-Poetry974 on
I knew the British basically brought Indians as slaves to most of those places indicated but didn’t know so many were brought to Guyana and Mauritius. I wonder if British kids are taught this is school. This is well after “formal” slavery was ended in the empire. I have friends of Indian decent here in Canada from Guyana, Trinidad and Fiji so I was aware of this for a long time.
Lothdrak on
You forgot the most famous east african Indian : Freddy Mercury.
PrestigiousAd2644 on
Can someone explain how 431,000 ended up in Mauritius to me? Isn’t that a small island? Like …where did they go ?
DrummerHistorical493 on
That may be the case however they were paid, despite it being a pittance. They endured very difficult times however likely not as difficult as the slaves brought over to the west from east Africa.
spoorloos3 on
Is Suriname not included?
JamCom on
Oh its talked about. But as youll noticed only 50ish thousand got anywhere near america which is reddits bread and butter. For those of us who work the other areas they went to, the Indian presence is well known
Nice_Boss776 on
And the Indian Government is still doing the same to most of its citizens today.
vadakkus on
Lol funny to see slavery and colonial apologists tie themselves up in little knots trying to whitewash their favourite time of history.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
23 Kommentare
It’s not slavery if we don’t call it slavery mindset
[deleted]
I had a 5th gen Indopak friend from Mombasa, Kenya
None in Australia?
They were paid contracted workers, not slaves. In most cases they begged to be allowed to stay instead of going back to India after their contracts expired.
Half of the diaspora mixed with black population, that’s why people talk about it less. The identity is diluted
For example, Kamala Harris, Nicki Minaj, tyla are results of this mix.
Indian try not to play the victim challenge: Impossible
There is a massive and discernible difference between slavery and indentured servitude
Seems to be missing the Indians brought to modern day Myanmar. Many Indians are 3rd or 4th generation Myanmar born and still seen as second class citizens here as a result.
Rishi and Zohran’s East African Indian roots are in the wealthy mercantile community not the indentured labour groups. There are very much class and caste issues at play.
What about Suriname? Or is that included in British Guyana or Trinidad?
Indentured labour ≠ Slavery
Indentured servants =/= slaves.
Lovely to see the OP block me for posting things that prove this wrong.
I worked in two pharmacies as a technician and one colleague from one pharmacy was a person of Indian descent from Fiji and another person from another pharmacy was a person of Indian descent from Guyana.
I knew the British basically brought Indians as slaves to most of those places indicated but didn’t know so many were brought to Guyana and Mauritius. I wonder if British kids are taught this is school. This is well after “formal” slavery was ended in the empire. I have friends of Indian decent here in Canada from Guyana, Trinidad and Fiji so I was aware of this for a long time.
You forgot the most famous east african Indian : Freddy Mercury.
Can someone explain how 431,000 ended up in Mauritius to me? Isn’t that a small island? Like …where did they go ?
That may be the case however they were paid, despite it being a pittance. They endured very difficult times however likely not as difficult as the slaves brought over to the west from east Africa.
Is Suriname not included?
Oh its talked about. But as youll noticed only 50ish thousand got anywhere near america which is reddits bread and butter. For those of us who work the other areas they went to, the Indian presence is well known
And the Indian Government is still doing the same to most of its citizens today.
Lol funny to see slavery and colonial apologists tie themselves up in little knots trying to whitewash their favourite time of history.