Share.

    12 Kommentare

    1. PestoBolloElemento on

      By Mark Shreoers & Alexander Weber.

      European Union governments agreed on a common position on the digital euro, marking an important milestone for the project that’s seen as crucial for the bloc’s monetary sovereignty and the joint currency’s global role as the US touts dollar-denominated stablecoins.

      “The digital euro is an important step toward a more robust and competitive European payment system, and can contribute to Europe’s strategic autonomy and economic security, as well as a strengthened international role for the euro,” Danish Economy Minister Stephanie Lose said Friday in a statement published by the EU’s Council. Denmark currently holds the Council’s rotating presidency.

      The Council’s negotiation mandate stresses that “both its online and offline functional modalities are necessary and essential and both should therefore be available from the first issuance of the digital euro.” That’s in line with the European Central Bank’s position, but contrasts with a proposal by Fernando Navarrete, a leading European Union lawmaker on the topic.

      The ECB launched its digital-euro push in 2021, but is still awaiting the necessary legal framework. The European Commission issued its proposal in 2023. However, it took more than two years for member states to agree on a common approach. As next step, the European Parliament needs to finalize its own position before negotiations between lawmakers and the Council can start.

      Provided national governments and the parliament strike a deal next year the ECB may start a pilot phase in 2027, with a possible launch envisaged for 2029. Policymakers are increasingly worried about an over-dependence on US firms like Visa, Mastercard and PayPal for payments. Additionally, concerns have been swirling that stablecoins championed by US President Donald Trump could gain a foothold in Europe.

      In October, Navarrete, a member of the center-right European People’s Party, published his report in which he proposed an online version only if the private sector doesn’t come up with its own solution. The ECB has pushed back against this idea, saying both versions would be needed to reap the full benefits of the digital money.

      To avoid harming financial stability, governments emphasized the need for customer holding limits. Euro-area finance ministers had reached an accord on how to set these earlier this year, which foresees a close cooperation between the ECB and the Council.

      The Council’s statement published Friday also lays out the framework for how payment service providers shall be compensated. “During a transitional period of at least five years, interchange and merchant service charges will be capped at a level based on fees for comparable means of payments. “After the transitional period, fee caps will be set based on the actual costs associated with the digital euro,” it said.

    2. Seems sus. On one hand, a digital Euro sounds super dope – less paper waste, more convenience and all that jazz. But on the other hand, big bro government gettin‘ even bigger. Slippery slope, y’know what I’m sayin‘? Gotta watch out for that creeping control. Gotta weigh the pros n cons real careful like.

    3. SunflowerSync on

      This is a pretty big milestone, but it’s still far from being rolled out. Governments agreeing on the framework doesn’t automatically mean a digital euro is coming tomorrow the real debates will be about privacy, offline use, and how much control institutions have. A lot of public trust will depend on those details.

    4. TheGaelicPrince on

      Digital € to beat back the cryptocurrencies going around on the Internet.

    5. DizzyPangolin2363 on

      If you think the Digital Euro is positive in any sort of way, you are sheep.

    6. DasistMamba on

      You have a message from the government: „You have purchased too many sugar-containing products this month. Purchases of new sugar-containing products are blocked until further notice.“

    7. DepressedDraper on

      Saying anything negative about the digital Euro results in downvotes. Echo chamber much?

    8. johansugarev on

      The idea of not relying on Visa and Mastercard sounds great to me. However it needs to work everywhere and all EU countries must implement it together for it to be even remotely relevant.

    9. While this digital euro is clearly an advantage for EU sovereignty it needs to protect its users privacy.

      We are seeing what the EU is implemeting: voluntarily chat control, age verification, increased check for financial transactions etc. States should not have access to your day to day transactions. (You might be ok with this but when they will ban a political party = they will be able to check the history to see your membership payments; if they want to ban porn, you better not have any premium accounts; if they want to taxe any small gifts etc…)

      They are currently mecanisms to protect privacy for this digital euro BUT it should written at start that privacy is a right and one of the pillar of this project. Ok, if there is a lawful investigation for real suspicions of terrorism, money laundering etc, it’s understandable to access account details, like currently with bank accounts; but only for those particular cases and never on the whole population, and with judiciary verification.

      The point is we can’t be sure stuff like that won’t be used to monitor the population even more. They want to see your private messages. Your private pictures. (chat control etc) I think your bank account & transactions is the natural continuation.

      And you can’t sell me they wont try to use it to fight against undeclared work etc. And the only way to use it for that is to look at your transactions. And its much easier with a centralized system than with the banks as an intermediary.

      Too sad people don’t care about that though

    Leave A Reply