Share.

    13 Kommentare

    1. BearFromTheShining on

      Why would he need to sign a law for something he was already doing anyway? Doesn’t make it any less illegal.

    2. Necessary-Dot2714 on

      More 🐂💩 for Trump to blather as to why he understands Putin. They’re both glorified land speculators. We want Venezuela, Putin wants the Donbas at a minimum.

    3. Confiscating “ownerless” homes in occupied territories violates international humanitarian law and the rights of displaced Ukrainians. The world should condemn this, but we know that it won’t happen.

    4. skr_replicator on

      „Herbey it’s completely legal and ok to plunder all the homes and stuff of Ukrainians we have just murdered.“

    5. iliketea_001 on

      They already rename streets so the owners have no address to claim. But I guess it would be silly to rename EVERY street in occupied territories.

    6. Watch them wail though if the EU creates laws to sell their confiscated assets.

    7. So Zelenskyy should sign a law declaring all homes in Russia owned by soldiers who died in Ukraine as Ukraine’s property.

    8. midnightrider747 on

      Its all a sick plan to hinder a liberation later on.

      For me i would just throw all russian settlers out who dont belong there no questions asked.

      But an Army who is bound by international laws can’t displace thousands of russian settlers by a,whim or is this possible without refrain ?

    9. Lonely_Noyaaa on

      This isn’t new practice dressed up as law, it’s a formal legal framework that lets occupation authorities declare homes in Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia “ownerless” and seize them if people can’t prove ownership under Russian regulations. Owners often can’t comply because they’re displaced or lack documents.

    10. Slow-Conflict-3959 on

      One of the first things the frozen assets should be used for is the reparations to affected Ukrainian citizens who have lost their homes and possessions.

    Leave A Reply