Wenn Entscheidungen durch Algorithmen getroffen werden,
Welchen Sinn hat ein Manager noch?
KI verspricht ein rationaleres, objektiveres und messbareres Management.
Aber zu welchem Preis?
Ist das eine natürliche Entwicklung der Arbeit?
Oder eine Tendenz hin zu automatisiertem und aufdringlichem Management?
👉 Analyse des Themas hier (viel Diskussionsstoff):
Sind Sie dafür, dagegen oder unentschlossen?
Will managers be managing people… or algorithms?
byu/awefa1303 inFuturology
6 Kommentare
I think algorithms will be managing people. Middle management is worthless if a decision matrix can do it faster, cheaper, with less room for error, favouritism, fraud, nepotism or other BS. A decently trained model could do a lot of most middle to upper management in my job, learn from mistakes and make judgement calls based on the legal and legislative requirements.
I’m against 10 day old engagement farming accounts posting nonsense drivel
If so, then currwnt managers would not fit in management as they are trained and (hopefully) selected as people skilled in managing people. This is a whole different skillset to AI and algorithm management. It would most probably not be done by promts as we know it, but maybe a type of script language to ensure effective and clear understanding by the AI.
The middle class will be wiped out. Just rich and poor
It’s the other way around, algorithms will be managing people
Most of this discussion assumes that management is mainly about making optimal decisions.
In practice, a large part of management is about legitimacy, responsibility, and boundary-setting — who is allowed to decide what, under which conditions, and who absorbs the consequences when things go wrong.
Algorithms can execute decisions efficiently, but authority doesn’t disappear, it just gets displaced.
So as for me the real question is not “who manages” but where decision authority lives?