
Hochrangige Beamte aus Alberta verzögerten die Veröffentlichung von wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnissen über die Verschmutzung von Kohlebergwerken | Aus 600 Seiten Dokumente, die The Narwhal erhalten hat, geht hervor, dass ein Wissenschaftler der Regierung daran gehindert wurde, mit den Medien und Gemeindegruppen über seine Forschung zu sprechen
Senior Alberta officials stalled release of coal mine pollution science
2 Kommentare
One of the key sections from this investigation below:
>Senior Alberta government officials stalled the submission of a coal mine pollution study to a scientific journal and prevented the lead researcher from speaking publicly about his work, according to records The Narwhal obtained through a freedom of information request.
>
>Emails included among more than 600 pages of documents show officials delayed government scientist Colin Cooke from submitting a study about selenium pollution in the McLeod River watershed for four months after it was complete. The records also indicate Cooke was not permitted to participate in at least two media interviews or speak to a community group about his research, raising concerns the province is muzzling scientists and restricting the public’s access to tax-payer funded research.
>
>The delays came as Alberta was embroiled in a public debate about the future of coal mining in the Rockies, with the government lifting its moratorium on coal mining in the eastern slopes not long after Cooke eventually got the greenlight to submit his study.
>
>Cooke, an aquatic scientist who works for Alberta Environment and Protected Areas, has led multiple studies into the impacts of coal mining in Alberta’s Rocky Mountains. Working with scientists both inside and outside of government, Cooke’s research found historic coal mines in the Crowsnest Pass continue to pollute nearby waterways decades after they closed. He found snowpacks have been contaminated by windblown pollution from coal mines in southeast B.C. And more recently, he and his co-authors found concerning selenium concentrations in fish from Crowsnest Lake.
It’s pretty clear that the government is less than pleased with the results of the research, and is trying to suppress it so that their efforts to revitalise the coal industry can continue apace. This is clearly not in the public interest, as this runs counter to what the research is indicating.
Of all the hills to die on, why coal? It does have uses for steelmaking, but as a source of electricity it’s by *far* the worst option available.