Share.

    22 Kommentare

    1. Remote-Database9582 on

      Milan and Poland both did not completely avoid it but impact was small compared to other places.

      Poland: Not densely populated at that time, no really big cities. Lot of forests and rivers as barriers and no big trade routes crossing the country

      Milan: really strict and early measures like completely sealing houses with suspected Black death victims.

    2. jamiecastlediver on

      Crop failures in Europe, increased shipping of foods from the east by a massive amount and , well you know…

    3. gentleriser on

      Colour each year differently, ideally along a gradient, so make this more useful.

    4. I hate, HATE that the middle east and north Africa is ignored in black death discussions, when they had the same death rate as Europe did and impacted them at the same time

      The reason the mass dépopulation of Europe didn’t result in mass migrations was because the places that were next to Europe, were just as ravaged by the plague, there wasn’t an Arab invasion because of that

      The middle east and Europe are sister civilizations, very close together culturally, ethnically and historically, and the euro centric view of the plague ignotes the other half of the Mediterranean

    5. Any-Morning4303 on

      No didn’t the plague more or less skipped Russia?
      The lack of labor in Europe which was a result of the Black Death empowered the peasantry unlike Russia and the pail.

    6. KakaTuEsNul on

      The Black Death propelled Western Europe forward by several centuries by making labor scarce and thus improving workers’ treatment.

    Leave A Reply