Pornografie wird über bösartige PDFs in Regierungswebsites eingeschleust | Dutzende Regierungswebsites wurden Opfer eines PDF-basierten SEO-Betrugs, während andere gekapert wurden, um Sexspielzeug zu verkaufen.

    https://www.404media.co/porn-is-being-injected-into-government-websites-via-malicious-pdfs/

    Share.

    23 Kommentare

    1. Government fucking us regularly while also selling us toys to fuck ourselves. What a time to be alive.

    2. The brilliant Administration in place decided that it was a waste of money to have resources around to address Government security. Penny wise and pound foolish, as they say…

    3. It’s almost like comic sans and you know… cutting cyber security was a bad idea. Who knew?

      /s

    4. Hijacked?

      Na. That isn’t how this is done.

      If you buy a Trump coin and send the transaction code to whitehouse.gov, they will just offer you a government document to replace with any ad for free; sex toy, ivermectin/penis-enchancement pills, manly-man dating advice, whatever. They don’t care.

    5. Prize-Grapefruiter on

      I guess it wasn’t the Russian or Chinese „state sponsored“ (how do they know? did they confess?) hackers this time or it would have been in the title. so much effort to fuel hatred. sad really.
      sorry I’m not talking about this post, I’m rambling in general.

      anyway, does it matter what the OS is for these pdf’s to take effect?

    6. prometheum249 on

      Oh this is why PDFs are no longer previewable in explorer, and i get the message if i trust the origin of this file i can open it. It made my day frustrating yesterday

    7. theDudeHeavyC on

      Another win for US security in 2025. When does all this winning start again?

    8. MegaMechWorrier on

      Are they sure that this isn’t simply their leader’s latest grift?

      I mean, his grandpa *was* a pimp, so it’s not as if he’s a stranger to the sex industry.

    9. thebunhinge on

      Probably the most useful, least full of lies content on those sites these days.

    10. is it injecting porn or is it injecting porn ads? if the former, i don’t understand the complaint. 

    11. Necrophilicgorilla on

      I thought most legitimate organisations and businesses didn’t accept pictures but only PDFs because of possible malicious code in images.
      Am I to understand that they’re not scanning their PDFs before opening them?

    Leave A Reply