Nicht so vielfältig, wie manche denken könnten
Von Huge-Chemistry4148
Nicht so vielfältig, wie manche denken könnten
Von Huge-Chemistry4148
32 Kommentare
It’s interesting to see the affects colonization had here
Wait what’s the source for this? Not all countries conduct racial surveys, and those that do don’t all use the same categories.
Mestizos are radically different from pardos; it’s ridiculous to put them in the same group.
British did genocide as policy. Clear the land settle with British.
Australia
New Zealand
Canada
USA
Should have more natives
Oh well
Americans and „races“ …
Zambo, mestizo or pardo are brutally racist names. In fact, the zambo was in the Mexican colonial social class as something of very low lineage and of course with brown or black skin.
If you say it is a genetic source, put the source and subdivide the populations by genetic markers, not by some denominations from the European colonial 18th century….
most whites in Chile are Spaniards, Croatians and the French/German if I’m not mistaken
pie charts are the absolute worst
„Mulatto?“ How old is this map?
This map is completely misleading. These racial categories are socially constructed and context dependent. The same racial category means something else in another culture/country and other cultures can have different categories altogether.
A light-skinned black person in the US, with their heritage of the ‚one-drop-rule‘ can often be considered white or at least pardo in Brazil, for example. Even more, the same person can become also ‚more black‘ or ‚more white‘ if they lose or gain economic status.
Trying to calculate a racial makeup of a population through some characteristics of DNA and then assigning it to these imagined generalized social categories is highly dubious race science.
White people from Brazil are not necessarily Europeans. See Lebanese and other Afro-Asian populations with white skin who would not be considered white by American or European criteria
Argentina is definitely much whiter than that
Can it be considered mapporn if OP used 3 shades of green before he got the chance to use the last of the 3 primary colors(red).
There is a map in your racism
Why the hell is Curaçao so blue lmao. They’re very racist against what that color stands for xD
I’m guessing the person who made this has no idea what white European means 🤣
Shades of green are too similar
the mestizo numbers for Argentina and Uruguay look too high
the white number for Brazil is too high
there’s no way Brazil is as white as those two countries
I find the large South Asian populations of Guyana, T+T, and Suriname to be interesting
.
Poor definitions. Mulatto is by definition, multiracial. Is that group counted twice?
I cn map out 4 groups, Western White Northerners, Carribean Blacks, Amerindians, and Mixed White Mestizos.
The 10% indigenous in Chile is self identification but if “racially” most of that 10% are Mestizos
And the if you’re doing self identification, most Chileans identify as White (which in Chile just means fair-skinned)… so basically in the map you’re applying two methodologies for the same country.
DR and Puerto Rico are the goofiest parts of this map. There’s very little Mestizo in the Caribbean most mixed race is African and European not indigenous and European. That’s why Dominicans look like light-skinned African Americans not Mexicans smh.
God I hope the mods delete this
can this sub go 2 days without bringing up a racial or birth rate map.
Based on crap useless data
Brazil: 60% brown/mestizo 20% Black 20% white
People in Brazil who look like Sergio Busquets think they’re as white as Dirk Nowitzki; it’s a joke.
Mulatto butts……
In Canada, they separated WASP and people that speak canadian (aka french) that aren’t considered white by canada standard. Speak white they said to the canadian (aka french) speaking people.
What determines size of the chart? Why is lesser antillies so big?
Cuba is definitely not 2/3 “white”. Its more in line with PR and DR.