India has proposed a mandatory royalty system for AI companies that train their models on copyrighted content – a move that could reshape how OpenAI and Google operate in what has already become one of their most important and fastest-growing markets globally.
DonutsMcKenzie on
Decent move and I applaud it. At the least they are acknowledging the concept of copyright and IP ownership.
However, it’s really not good enough to pay a trifle tiny royalty after stealing and exploiting someone’s copyrighted work. Training an AI on someone’s work should require an explicit and specific up-front license. believe
**Consent** must be a factor, as should the creator have the **agency** to determine what they believe the monetary value of their work is.
If you make something, you decide what it is worth and price it accordingly, and the free market can either take it or leave it. For better or worse, that’s the basis of capitalism, and it is how things have traditionally worked in the developed world.
Evilbred on
India has no real power in this, both those companies are American and most of the content is too.
Maybe they should focus on India’s pollution and poverty problems first.
New_Relative_1871 on
Good move, honestly. We should do the same
kawaiij on
Well india better hurry up then
Elroelab on
India proposes slight inconvenience for industry that is destroying civilization.
Technical_Ad_440 on
they will just block india and they absolutely will. google doesn’t fear this at all either. with ai world models this llm era of ai is about to be completely moot
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
7 Kommentare
India has proposed a mandatory royalty system for AI companies that train their models on copyrighted content – a move that could reshape how OpenAI and Google operate in what has already become one of their most important and fastest-growing markets globally.
Decent move and I applaud it. At the least they are acknowledging the concept of copyright and IP ownership.
However, it’s really not good enough to pay a trifle tiny royalty after stealing and exploiting someone’s copyrighted work. Training an AI on someone’s work should require an explicit and specific up-front license. believe
**Consent** must be a factor, as should the creator have the **agency** to determine what they believe the monetary value of their work is.
If you make something, you decide what it is worth and price it accordingly, and the free market can either take it or leave it. For better or worse, that’s the basis of capitalism, and it is how things have traditionally worked in the developed world.
India has no real power in this, both those companies are American and most of the content is too.
Maybe they should focus on India’s pollution and poverty problems first.
Good move, honestly. We should do the same
Well india better hurry up then
India proposes slight inconvenience for industry that is destroying civilization.
they will just block india and they absolutely will. google doesn’t fear this at all either. with ai world models this llm era of ai is about to be completely moot