Close Menu
    Politics

    Die Grand Jury lehnt es ab, Letitia James erneut anzuklagen

    Share.
    View 38 Comments

    38 Kommentare

    3. Gamegis on

      I guess the Trump admin can actually put together a case so flimsy that they can’t get a ham sandwich indicted.

    4. Rocky-Sullivan on

      Unfortunately this is probably just going to keep happening until they get the outcome they want.

       

    5. lickem369 on

      You mean you can’t just charge someone with a crime because you don’t like them. Damn, learn something everyday!

    7. rolsen on

      > A grand jury declined to indict New York Attorney General Letitia James after being asked to look at the mortgage fraud case against her a second time, 10 days after a federal judge threw out the initial charges against her, according to a person familiar with the development Thursday.

      > Another source familiar with the situation said there should be no premature celebration, because the Justice Department could try to seek the indictment a third time.

      The DOJ might try for a *third* time.

    8. TurboSalsa on

      Another swing and a miss.

      >Another source familiar with the situation said there should be no premature celebration, because the Justice Department could try to seek the indictment a third time.

      But what happens when the grand jury declines to indict a third time? And what bozo is even bringing these charges now that Trump’s previous court jester has been disqualified?

    9. travio on

      I’d love to know what they argued with this grand jury vs the last one. Did they leave something out last time?

    10. HighbornHunger on

      People forget a grand jury is not a fan club. If they pass twice, it means the evidence was weak. Simple as that.

    11. blues111 on

      Interesting they opted to go for a new grand jury indictment rather than appeal the „Lindsey Halligan was illegally appointed“ ruling…are they just going to appoint someone else or….? Can they not actually appeal the dismissal??

      If they go this route Im pretty sure the comey indictment (for perjury at least) would be dead because of statute of limitations 

    12. Cresta1994 on

      Stupid grand jury. She hurt Trump’s wittle fee-fees. I’m pretty sure the Supreme Court said that’s a capital offense.

    13. Wonderful-Impact-598 on

      So rotate those ones out and go for Hunter Biden and Mark Kelly next?

    19. Atheist_3739 on

      Lol I thought the joke was that a grand jury would indict a ham sandwich. How incompetent do you have to be 😆

    22. ununuii on

      Fuck it, take a third bite at the apple, why not. Can the fact that this prosecution has eaten shit twice already be admissible as defense arguments to the jury?

    25. Mysterious-Wasabi103 on

      Remember when Republicans acted like literally anyone could get indicted by a grand jury of their peers?

    26. LoFi_Funk on

      Funny because the requirements for a grand jury are pretty loose. Tells you there’s no tangible evidence of wrongdoing.

    27. DirectLow421 on

      Citizens participating in the rule of law. Proud to be an American 🇺🇸

      Wild too that it is sooo much easier to get a grand jury indictment vs a jury conviction.

      And Trump was convicted 34 times by a jury.

    28. thehalfwit on

      It’s almost as if the only evidence of crime is on the other side of the aisle.

    29. Fit-Significance-436 on

      Good for her, trump team will keep trying to sell this bs, but glad to hear no one is buying

    35. zero_cool1138 on

      Its a politically motivated prosecution as much as hers against Trumps was. Shes absolutely guilty its just rich,connected people in power almost never get prosecuted for it.

    37. petit_cochon on

      Maybe the third time will be the charm for this tire fire of a prosecution.

    38. waitIcanexplainguys on

      Correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t that be double jeopardy, which is a violation of the 5th amendment?

    Leave A Reply