„Es wäre falsch“: Warum die Einwohner von Richmond, BC, nicht über den Titelanspruch der First Nation informiert wurden
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/cowichan-claim-aboriginal-private-property-9.7000502
„Es wäre falsch“: Warum die Einwohner von Richmond, BC, nicht über den Titelanspruch der First Nation informiert wurden
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/cowichan-claim-aboriginal-private-property-9.7000502
4 Kommentare
[removed]
BC Conservatives will be campaigning hard with this next provincial election.
> and fee simple title, which conveys absolute ownership of private property in B.C.
Not really. The Crown is still the absolute owner, but fee simple title allows you to do a lot of things with the property, so that it can feel like absolute ownership. Expropriation and mineral rights are two clear examples of how it isn’t actually absolute ownership.
> He cited Vickers again, saying that if the ruling meant private landowners got „something less than what they bargained for“ — then they should take it up with the Crown, not the First Nation the land was taken from.
Unfortunately, racism and democracy makes it easier to attack First Nations than the government.
This is a good and informative article about how we got to this point where land owners weren’t notified years ago.
Sad to say it’s been pretty rare to see such good and objective reporting on this topic where most news outlets seem to see it as an opportunity to write some hot headlines and get clicks.