Eine übermäßige Abhängigkeit von KI birgt die Gefahr, dass das kritische Denken neuer und zukünftiger Ärzte untergraben wird und gleichzeitig bestehende Vorurteile verstärkt werden. GenAI-Tools werden bereits in großem Umfang eingesetzt, obwohl es nur wenige institutionelle Richtlinien und regulatorische Leitlinien gibt.

I’ve linked to the press release in the post above. In this comment, for those interested, here’s the link to the peer reviewed journal article:

https://ebm.bmj.com/content/30/6/406

Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

From the linked article:

**Overreliance on AI risks eroding new and future doctors’ critical thinking while reinforcing existing bias*+

Tools already widely used amid few institutional policies and regulatory guidance

Medical education must adjust curricula + training to mitigate risks, warn experts

Overreliance on generative AI risks eroding new and future doctors’ critical thinking skills, while potentially reinforcing existing data bias and inequity, warns an editorial published in the online journal BMJ Evidence Based Medicine.

**GenAI tools are already being widely used amid few institutional policies and regulatory guidance**, point out the authors, who urge medical educators to exercise vigilance and adjust curricula and training to mitigate the technology’s pitfalls.

The use of AI is now used in a vast array of different tasks, but along with its burgeoning potential comes an increasing risk of overreliance on it and a host of potential issues for medical students and trainee doctors, note the authors from the University of Missouri, Columbia, USA.