Some of the Supreme Court’s comments are just *so* close to realizing that internet access needs to be a utility due to its integration in modern life.
mikeymikebriz on
Wait until they get involved in the Ai data scraping
Zhiong_Xena on
For all the downsides, at least AI made piracy a far more murky crime than it was. Since big AI pirates content en masse, it gives everyone an incentive to follow suit. If AI can do it at that large a scale for the benifits of whole corporations, why should any random joe not do the same for their own simple personal use?
guaztronaut on
I like to imagine Clarence Thomas on his kitchen floor after a fall and the dispatcher is just like nah.
boboclock on
Rare W for Supreme Court if true
motohaas on
And yet all if fine for AI to use
EscapeFacebook on
I don’t usually side with Providers but in this case I do. They should too.
Krunkledunker on
Off topic but got me thinking about the file sharing lawsuits years back and wondering if AI companies will ever see similar consequences for their training
ResilientBiscuit on
Of course they are going to side with the ISP. If they don’t then sites that let users publish content, like Reddit or Facbook are going to have real problems. If that happens, Republicans are going to lose their biggest tool to spread misinformation and fear. They need social media to exist.
clegg2011 on
If an ISP is held liable for piracy, then so too should the power company for providing power the computer, modem, and router, and the water company for quenching the accused thirst, and so and and so forth.
PauI_MuadDib on
If they terminate your Internet access for pirating then Meta needs their access terminated too:
13 Kommentare
Maybe the ISP’s made better bribes?
So is this like a W or what?
Some of the Supreme Court’s comments are just *so* close to realizing that internet access needs to be a utility due to its integration in modern life.
Wait until they get involved in the Ai data scraping
For all the downsides, at least AI made piracy a far more murky crime than it was. Since big AI pirates content en masse, it gives everyone an incentive to follow suit. If AI can do it at that large a scale for the benifits of whole corporations, why should any random joe not do the same for their own simple personal use?
I like to imagine Clarence Thomas on his kitchen floor after a fall and the dispatcher is just like nah.
Rare W for Supreme Court if true
And yet all if fine for AI to use
I don’t usually side with Providers but in this case I do. They should too.
Off topic but got me thinking about the file sharing lawsuits years back and wondering if AI companies will ever see similar consequences for their training
Of course they are going to side with the ISP. If they don’t then sites that let users publish content, like Reddit or Facbook are going to have real problems. If that happens, Republicans are going to lose their biggest tool to spread misinformation and fear. They need social media to exist.
If an ISP is held liable for piracy, then so too should the power company for providing power the computer, modem, and router, and the water company for quenching the accused thirst, and so and and so forth.
If they terminate your Internet access for pirating then Meta needs their access terminated too:
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/meta-staff-torrented-nearly-82tb-of-pirated-books-for-ai-training-court-records-reveal-copyright-violations