
CD Projekts PC-Game-Storefront GOG stellt sich nach dem Steam-Verbot von Valve hinter die Kulissen: „Spieler sollten in der Lage sein, die Erlebnisse auszuwählen, die sie ansprechen“
https://www.ign.com/articles/cd-projekts-pc-game-storefront-gog-gets-behind-horses-after-valve-steam-ban-players-should-be-able-to-choose-the-experiences-that-speak-to-them

11 Kommentare
Who is the target audience for this?
>**CONTENT WARNING**: This game contains scenes of physical violence, psychological abuse, gory imagery (mutilation, blood), depictions of slavery, physical and psychological torture, domestic abuse, sexual assault, suicide, and misogyny. The inclusion of these elements is intended to depict and characterize a fictional world and its fictional inhabitants. The presence of these elements is not an endorsement of them, nor do they reflect the beliefs or values of the creators. Some scenes also feature unsettling sounds, such as chewing and swallowing, which may be disturbing for players with sound sensitivities or related phobias. Character dialogue also includes references to psychological trauma that may be upsetting, especially for those who may have had similar experiences in their pasts. Player discretion is advised. If you feel uncomfortable or upset while playing, please consider stepping away and reaching out to someone you trust.
I have no idea what this title is telling me
Unfortunately, children riding naked women like horses doesn’t speak to me.
You don’t need to like the horse game stuff, but letting adults choose what they play feels way more reasonable than a blanket ban.
GOG has a stricter policy of what is and isn’t allowed than Steam, they have no right to talk about this at all.
Oh GOG… no…. No no no. Not like this. 🤦♂️
This game looks disgusting and is one of the few times I think it’s OK for the industry to moderate the drivel some individuals decide to push to people. The fact for years they had naked children in this sexualized gross product and only changed it from „child“ to presumably „20 year old“ when they were told no, means the devs are just vile anyway. It’s irritating how much attention this game is getting.
Pedophilias biggest defenders in these comments. Peak reddit gamer
Man, the narratives being spun around this are wild…
Looking it over along with people’s post history, many people see defenders of the game as perverted Gamergate style freaks meanwhile many of those attacking it are also full-time culture warriors defending us all from weird woke socially conscious art
Sure, but it’s not unreasonable for a platform to decide you get one chance to submit and if you fail to pass muster that’s it. The devs made some bad choices, assumed they’d be able to get away with it if they fixed it and Steam said no, you’re done. It’s not crazy to not give sketchy devs multiple tries to slip questionable content though.
Useing a .wtf as their domain seems accurate.