Es ist leicht, es nicht zu bemerken, aber die Luftsicherheit war tatsächlich unglaublich gut, schon vor 2001.
Es gibt viele Möglichkeiten, Flugzeuge zu erkennen. Es gibt NORAD, Jets stürmen auf ein Flugzeug zu, wenn es als verdächtig markiert ist, was passiert, wenn sie nicht auf Radarsignale reagieren. Dann würden sie jede Katastrophe verhindern.
Bei den beiden Flugzeugen, die die Zwillingstürme trafen, geschah dies jedoch nicht.
Und das Pentagon wurde von keinem Flugzeug getroffen, aber es war unmöglich, dass ein Flugzeug es treffen könnte, wenn man bedenkt, dass die Sicherheit und auch die Sicherheit des Pentagons ihre eigene ist.
Es ist interessant, dass das einzige Flugzeug, das angeflogen wurde, der Pennsylvania-Flug 93 war. Warum nur dieses?
Es tut mir leid für die über 3000 unschuldigen Menschen, die durch Korruption gestorben sind, und es ist traurig, dass die USA weiterhin korrupt sind, ohne dass es irgendetwas gibt, was sie stoppen könnte.
Von Nathidev
21 Kommentare
i honestly still think the most suspicious part is how the planes were allowed to make those sharp turns without any immediate response. like why did no one react when flight paths completely diverted?
There *are* reasons they didn’t scramble and they make the whole incident far more suspicious.
Most of the jets normally present on the East coast had been reassigned for training exercises leaving far fewer fighter squadrons active than normal.
Another training exercise pretty much entirely stalled the reaction from ground control by injecting false radar contacts onto the screen in a simulated hijacking exercise.
The number of training exercises running that day was absurd.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_government_operations_and_exercises_on_September_11,_2001
This is just one of many issues the official narrative has. That official narrative crumbles in seconds when actually scrutinized and requests for actual evidence are made.
[deleted]
The plane that hit the south tower was traveling 586mph. (google if you like) At that speed and altitude it would be extremely difficult or not even possible at all to control due to the high air density. Yet those terrorists had no problem making that large turn in to line up with the tower. Same terrorists who had difficulty with small single engine planes during flight school beforehand.
The war games taking place that day removed 90% of jets from the northeast air defense sector. The names of the exercises were Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior and others. The book ‘Crossing the Rubicon’ by Mike Ruppert covers them all in depth with confirmation from high ranking military command.
The exercises were so vital to the paralysis that day that the 911 Commission Report barely mentioned them, relegating them to a single, incorrect footnote.
Government was complicit. Some of their wealthy friends made out in options of impact on stocks.
I think a big reason is hijackings before 9/11 usually ended with them returning the plane to the airport and demanding some kind of ransom. So Its possible atc thought this was going to happen and when it didn’t, then they started really getting fighters in the air.
They were all told to stand down, inside job.
Despite all my research I’ll never understand if the WTC planes were actually real with the passengers aboard, or swapped with empty remotely flown planes. It really does feel like they were real, with the passengers on them, but who was flying then and why? Who would willingly hijack a plane and crash it knowing it was all essentially staged anyway.
It is definitely clear Pentagon and Shanksville weren’t planes. Although to be fair the “AMERICAN” fuselage on the pentagon lawn is tough to explain.
There were no planes to scramble. They diverted them all for silly war games in the North Atlantic, simulating hijacked commercial airliners of course. Courtesy of Dickhead Cheney.
The declassified rejected plan by JFK, **Operation Northwoods** is a good read, you can basically switch out a few things in that plan and you have 9/11.
[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods)
———-
You can say the same about 7th of October in Israel, the most heavily guarded border aside from North/South Korea suddenly has all their security AFK? No camera systems? No checkpoints? Nobody alerting central command? No jets(aircraft) being sent there immediately?
But we’re supposed to believe Hamas just walked in without any real opposition, was able to do whatever for hours and even retreat with hostages without any military response?
But then later on they show us jets striking targets in Iran, blasting Gaza from the map with air strikes with little time between these actions. They also claim they know EXACTLY where Hamas are hiding in whatever random building they marked for destruction, yet this form of intelligence was unavailable on the 7th of October?
There are a lot of convenient coincidences…
They weren’t suspicious yet I dont think our military was prepared to shoot down commercial airliners back then, today I could see it occurring
They got away with it.
The jets NOT being scrambled was part of the plan all along.
-Bibi.
clearly the reason is b/c cheney told norad to stand down
Engineering-wise, I don’t think there were controlled demolitions and that these were probably real planes with real hijackers. More realistic to me is that the government knew that this was coming and let it happen anyway. Any kind of attack of this scale was going to get the results intended and the specifics didn’t really matter at that point.
There were conveniently elsewhere…
[https://corbettreport.com/911wargames/](https://corbettreport.com/911wargames/)
…training for such an attack.
The answer you are looking for is Mike Pence
I was living in New Jersey about 5-10 minutes outside of Manhattan at the time of 9/11. Jets were scrambled. As a matter of fact, New Jersey 101.5 who won an award for their coverage that day actually had personnel from McGuire’s Air Force Base live on phone claiming that they had shot down a plane in Pennsylvania. They even did an in-depth conversation about how hard decisions have to be made. And how people should have an understanding for how hard it was for the pilots to have carried out such an order. But that the order had to be made and it came from the president himself. It was really drawn out with a bunch of military officials and then never talked about again. Jim gearhart was the host. He’s also credited for being the first person to deliver the news to the public that America is under attack. I remember I had the radio on. And in the middle of talking he just stopped and he said ladies and gentlemen it appears that the United States of America is under attack. He delivered that news 3 minutes after the first plane hit
What a stupid post. Your title says there is no reason, and then implied that there was a reason, which was that it was planned to be that way.
No matter what you believe happened that day, conspiracy or not, obviously there was a reason behind the decision not to scramble fighters for the other hijacked flights.
So which one is it?