Share.

    5 Kommentare

    1. ilovemybaldhead on

      Non-firewalled link: [https://archive.ph/JaFrO](https://archive.ph/JaFrO)

      Most relevant paragraph:

      >In*Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment*, the justices will decide whether an internet provider can be held responsible for failing to terminate subscribers accused of repeat copyright infringements. The ruling could determine whether access to the internet—today’s lifeline for education, work, and civic life—can be taken away as punishment for digital misdeeds. Cox’s indifference to repeat infringement is condemnable, but a sweeping ruling could harshly punish thousands for one company’s bad faith.

    2. Twitter isn’t responsible for deadly terrorist attacks organized on their platform, but Cox is responsible for someone downloading a TSwift song without paying. We live in a dystopia

    3. UnwantedUnnamed on

      Welp time to sail the high seas and download everything before a ruling passes

    4. Funny how this is the internet crime that makes is to the supreme court… not you know, human trafficking, child exploitation… just something that might cause financial damage to a corporation.

      Profits over people yet again.

    Leave A Reply