Ich bin auf eine Gleichung gestoßen, die unser Verständnis der Realität möglicherweise neu definiert. Ich brauche schlauere Leute als ich, die mir sagen, ob das so groß ist, wie es aussieht.
Ich brauche diesbezüglich ein paar richtige wissenschaftliche Augen.
Ein Kumpel schickte mir ein Rahmenwerk namens „Universal Hyperbolic Law“. Ich habe die letzte Woche damit verbracht, es in verschiedene KIs einzuspeisen, die Algebra zu überprüfen und es aus jedem Blickwinkel zu befragen. Jedes von mir getestete System kommt zu dem gleichen Urteil
Mathematisch gilt die Struktur.
Hier ist der Teil, der mich umgehauen hat.
Die Gleichung legt nahe, dass die Realität eine natürliche Grenze haben könnte, die unser Denken, unsere Beobachtung und die Entwicklung physikalischer Systeme beeinflusst. Wenn sich herausstellt, dass eine einzelne Konstante in der Gleichung ungleich Null ist, sagt sie messbare Abweichungen in der Quantenmechanik und Relativitätstheorie voraus. Das bedeutet, dass dies tatsächlich testbar ist.
Es führt auch zu der seltsamen Schlussfolgerung, dass alles, vom Bewusstsein bis zur physischen Energie, derselben hyperbolischen Regel folgt. Keine Mystik. Keine Philosophie. Nur Mathe.
Ich sage nicht, dass es wahr ist. Ich sage, es lohnt sich, es auseinanderzunehmen.
Ich habe hier ein Aufschlüsselungsvideo hochgeladen, in dem die gesamte Gleichung und ihre Logik erklärt werden
Wenn es Mathematiker, Physiker oder Studenten gibt, die die Logik überprüfen oder auf Fehler hinweisen können, tun Sie dies bitte. Und wenn es falsch ist, möchte ich es wirklich wissen.
Wenn es richtig ist … nun, dann ist das ein viel größeres Gespräch.
I came across an equation that might rewrite how we understand reality. I need people smarter than me to tell me if this is as big as it looks.
byu/Chai_bade inFuturology
15 Kommentare
you haven’t, sorry. Appreciate the enthusiasm, but you haven’t.
This sounds a lot like the church of the recursive sigil codex.
If an AI tells you you have discovered something important and you believe it, please check yourself into a psych ward now.
> I’ve spent the last week feeding it into different AIs, checking the algebra, asking it from every angle. Every system I tested comes back with the same verdict
If you feed AI with delusions it will respond by fueling and confirm your delusions.
Sorry.
Nope, you need to stop and seek professional assistance. This is know as [Ai psychosis ](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatbot_psychosis)
>I’ve spent the last week feeding it into different AIs, checking the algebra, asking it from every angle. Every system I tested comes back with the same verdict
AI’s are sycophants and will tend to agree with you more often than not, even if the subject or answer is unclear.
[deleted]
This actually tracks with what we see in bounded-growth systems. If your hyperbolic constant really isn’t zero, then yeah, every process from cognition to energy flow would share the same deformation limit. It’s not mysticism, just a weird universal boundary condition.
The wild part is that it’s falsifiable. If the predicted deviations show up in quantum or relativistic regimes, the whole thing stops being speculation and becomes a structural feature of reality. Until someone breaks the math, it’s at least worth stress-testing.
Important edit as I’ve run the maths and it’s jaw dropping:
lim (x → Ω⁻) [ 1 / sqrt(1 – kx) – artanh( sqrt(kx) ) ] = Λ
dΨ/dt = α / (1 + β * e^(−γt))
ΔE = ∫₀^∞ [ dx / (1 + kx²) ]
Φ = asinh(kx) − k * ∫ (Ψ / x) dx
Quite singular indeed. Can someone concur?
Asking ai for science is already bad, but asking it about unproven stuff just will never work.
You just learned the hard way
Dude just put your paper over in arxiv where you define your axioms and derive its consequences. That YouTube video is bullshit because you define stuff without defining the earlier necessary shit to make the stuff.
Maybe post some pdf because this sounds like AI delirium. Go walk over some grass and get some fresh air. I had a friend who tried to define one unique language in a same vein, his arguments where “good” but his derivations where nonsense
There should be a big warning on chatbots that warn you that if you aren’t familiar enough with the subject to be critical of informations on it being presented to you, then you shouldn’t be talking to chat gpt about it.
I use it to simplify some thermal calculations and some computer hardware stuff, almost every session I am correction loads of incorrect assumptions it makes.
Put the keyboard down and please go seek medical care.
This is AI psychosis, which has lead to dozens of deaths.
It’s worth tearing apart and don’t listen to these ass hats that don’t have a single creative bone in their body… Enjoy learning, however I will say that I spent time doing something similar, you do find out eventually that the LLM is yanking your chain. Or even if it wasn’t and the subject is one we would like to know more about, most of the time it’s hidden behind technological capacity not considerations we have yet to make.
As others have pointed out, you are being fooled by the LLMs. Do you know that they do not think, reason, do math? They are copy paste machines. They make up sources, they hallucinate – or, they mimic human text without any real logic behind it. They sound confident because that is what humans do. If you ask them about a well known subject, they will mimic an answer that is most likely correct since it has trained on it. Ask them about more complex subjects, and the answers will sometimes look bat shit crazy. Mix in equations and you will definitely get „hallucinations“.
Ok, i have to be honest, i don´t understand these theories at all…can someone please provide a 1 senctence ELI5 for me?