Share.

    26 Kommentare

    1. Complete-Captain2211 on

      Epstein bombshell drops—unsealed emails expose YOUR leaders‘ deep ties: texting pedo traffickers for dirt, soliciting funds, even during victim hearings. Clinton flights, Hoffman, Summers in the mix. Raskin slammed for leaks; AG Bondi probes Dem entanglements.

    2. Complete-Captain2211 on

      The whole world still doesn’t know what will happen and what dirty relationships will come out of it…

      The documents passed the US Senate.

      Now everyone’s eyes are turned to which names and which dark webs this scandal will reveal.

      During the Trump period, these files were closed.

      But now the lid of the logar is opening and the possibility of what will be scattered will affect the whole world is very high…

      I personally think that a process has begun, pregnant with greater developments organized by a “hidden hand” from the heavens, which will shake the whole world over the great tragedy experienced by children.

    3. Objective-Sun9953 on

      National Security!

      The catch all excuse to hide all tax paid criminals.

    4. imminentjunkie on

      I think a government protecting these people is a higher threat to national security.

    5. DevilsLettucePrey on

      You didn’t see this coming from the get go? Come on… He kills himself. She’s in talks with the government and getting relocated. How can anyone be surprised. It didn’t exist. It exists and we’re investigating. It didn’t have anything in it. We’re looking into it again…

    6. anonononnnnnaaan on

      National security from 2019? Let’s not forget. Epstein has been dead for 6 years.

      Trump took classified documents and told people about them. I’m pretty sure we can read over the documents and do what is spelled out in the bill

      Redact and produce a summary. If Congress questions it, let a bipartisan group see it in a SCIF.

    7. MerryMisandrist on

      Going to make a prediction here, when these are released nothing is going to happen.

    8. Binarydemons on

      Odd that Speaker Johnson voted for it, and is now bringing this to attention.

    9. makes you wonder how rich powerful men abusing children could involve national security, no?

    10. Dear Mike: We just need the names. Names are names–they are not intelligence agency materials. You can hide all of that.

    11. Running_Gamer on

      Why is anyone criticizing this? This is true of literally any intelligence document. You can’t just release information talking about how you gather intelligence.

    12. He’s gotta be on his umpteenth explanation at this point.  

      If he was so adamant against releasing it, he shouldn’t have voted for it.  

    13. Can’t let those sources and methods get out….lol

      How about you keep all the files and just post the real list of people who r@ped kids. No omissions.

      R@pist name, date/location of incident and age of the person r@ped.

    14. South-Rabbit-4064 on

      What could possibly be in there that would damage national security

    15. so Epstein was a Mossad honey trap scheme to collect blackmail video of world leaders raping kids — so that genocide in Palestine would proceed, funded by ballooning the US  national debt 

      to keep that information secret is treason . . .

    16. AndrewSwells on

      Likely the Saudi connection. More than likely connections to 9/11, and that many people knew it was going to happen ahead of time, including the Bush and Clinton families, as well as major players in the general area. Epstein goes much, much deeper than we know and is still connected in the after life (I’m looking at you Hakeem).

    17. Ooooh this doesn’t sound boring at all. He should answer to why Trump called the Epstein hoax boring if it contained national security materials and nothing but Democratic politicians.

    18. everydaycarrie on

      If the intelligence agencies and doj had done their jobs, every child rapist caught up in this would have been prosecuted under US law.

      But since they refuse to do their jobs, they are now complicit in the crimes.

      Don’t forget that. If they did their jobs in the first place, the public would have no need to.demand information that could have national security implications.

    19. washingtonu on

      The Speaker is embarrassing himself for some reason. But he only complains about the bill before the House and the Senate voted on it. If anyone wants to argue that national security information is in the investigations then the question is why that wasn’t a problem during the Epstein/Maxwell cases? There’s certain procedures that needs to be followed when classified information is involved.

      More from Johnson here:
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_twvCXctn4I

    Leave A Reply