Habe das online gesehen. Eine Psyops-Bewertungstabelle für Weltereignisse. Je höher das #, desto wahrscheinlicher ist es, dass es sich um einen Psyops handelt.
One of the biggest indicators are suspiciously viral pre-cursor events which eventually support a large event which has not happened yet. You know, those seemingly random stories that pop up in one podcast that seems like fairly normal happening.. but all of a sudden 20 podcasts spontaneously decide to pick it up.
What you’re likely seeing with those small events are research firms working their target audiences and doing research for covering future events. Usually, you’ll see a suspiciously dense and active event paired with very strong and hostile opinions for what’s otherwise fairly non-eventful, seemingly random, and doesn’t really stand out aside from its sudden blanketing.
Usually something larger then happens a week or two later and runs almost directly parallel, supplementing individuals with both *very strong opinions.* Alongside that, usually some type of PAC-fronted agenda *directly related* usually hits. Of course all along, you can tell because there are magnitudes increased levels of hostility along the way.
That’s usually their MO.
Eazy46 on
**are** real
itsjehmun on
OP I was looking for this form, there others out there, can you post the link to where you got this possibly printable?
loqi0238 on
Someone saw The Why Files yesterday.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
4 Kommentare
One of the biggest indicators are suspiciously viral pre-cursor events which eventually support a large event which has not happened yet. You know, those seemingly random stories that pop up in one podcast that seems like fairly normal happening.. but all of a sudden 20 podcasts spontaneously decide to pick it up.
What you’re likely seeing with those small events are research firms working their target audiences and doing research for covering future events. Usually, you’ll see a suspiciously dense and active event paired with very strong and hostile opinions for what’s otherwise fairly non-eventful, seemingly random, and doesn’t really stand out aside from its sudden blanketing.
Usually something larger then happens a week or two later and runs almost directly parallel, supplementing individuals with both *very strong opinions.* Alongside that, usually some type of PAC-fronted agenda *directly related* usually hits. Of course all along, you can tell because there are magnitudes increased levels of hostility along the way.
That’s usually their MO.
**are** real
OP I was looking for this form, there others out there, can you post the link to where you got this possibly printable?
Someone saw The Why Files yesterday.