Jeffrey Epsteins Bruder behauptet, er habe „aus ziemlich guter Quelle“ gehört, dass republikanische Namen aus Epstein-Akten gelöscht werden

    https://people.com/epstein-s-brother-heard-from-a-pretty-good-source-that-the-epstein-files-are-being-scrubbed-of-republican-names-11851691?utm_campaign=peoplemagazine&utm_medium=social&utm_source=reddit.com&utm_content=post

    Share.

    38 Kommentare

    1. peoplemagazine on

      TLDR:

      * Mark Epstein, brother of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, has alleged that the Epstein files are being edited to remove Republican names
      * „The reason they’re going to be releasing the files … is that they’re sabotaging these files,“ Mark told NewsNation
      * Mark’s comments come shortly after President Donald Trump encouraged House Republicans to vote to release the files

    2. The originals will be leaked and will expose this.

      At some point someone will need to ask why „National Security“ has a political bias.

    3. TintedApostle on

      Of course they are. The complete lack of any republican names will be the true tell because we already know a bunch.

    4. This was always a given, especially with Trump being so down for them to be released suddenly. This administration has shown how incompetent they can be even holding all the cards, you can expect them to leave in a few things that can be followed up on, contradictions here and there, etc;

    5. ArArmytrainingsir on

      Good. Takes lots of people to scrub list and know about it. So they can all go to jail.

    6. Quiet-Corner6150 on

      It’s frankly the only reason I expect there’s suddenly a push for it. Heck, wouldn’t be surprised if the „shutdown“ was just time they spent doctoring everything, knowing it’d come right back up when it was over. They’re not so stupid they’d just willingly reveal a criminal underworld that implicates them. This was always supposed to be a Democrat hit piece (or at least shied away from other major personalities) and that’s the best we’ll get.

      Or they’ll just make up some other „excuse“ why they can’t release them „right now“, i.e. never

    7. iloovehugecock on

      What is this guys relationship with Epstein like? Were they close? Does he agree/disagree his brother was a sex trafficking paedophile? I find it hard to gauge how to process anything he says because I don’t know who he is or what his agenda might be

    8. this idea still strikes me as pretty dumb. sure they can change the documents, but there are *hundreds* of victims. unless they murdered all of them, then they can just be like ’nah, that shit’s wrong. here’s the real list‘. and they can read it from the house floor so noone can get sued. i’m pretty sure MTG already said she would at some point.

    9. Just_Cruzen on

      Hopefully they can get those text messgaes/call logs and hold those people scrubbing the republicans accountable.

    10. Eridanosvoid on

      Hasn’t it been explained that multiple copies exist outside of what the DOJ has?

    11. anditurnedaround on

      I’m sure. If you ask for evidence of something and get a lot of push back and no, then finally, sure here it all is, it should at least be suspect. 

      Even a gf/bf would suspect the other of erasing or changing data if they wouldn’t turn over their phone for a long time and suddenly said, have at it. You probably wouldn’t even bother to look. 

    12. My only hope is that the ones named have dirt on the ones not being named.

    13. libginger73 on

      Find what: Donald Trump

      Replace with: Bill „Bubba“ Clinton

      Replace All *click*

      „We made 15,000 replacements. Do you want to search the rest of the document?“

    14. Most-Artichoke6184 on

      It’s impossible for them to get away with it because first of all, you cannot do that without leaving a trace. Second of all, so many people would need to be involved that they could never keep it a secret.

    15. ranchoparksteve on

      Trump’s concealment is a lost cause. The Epstein Estate has all the emails and hasn’t been objecting to data requests. This is how we know so much already.

    16. GatewayArcher on

      I wish the drafters/sponsors of the Epstein Files Transparency Act would have included provisions allowing for *in camera* review of the Govt’s redactions to ensure they are not simply redacting names of Republicans, friends of Trump, & GOP donors. Presumably any individual redactions could be challenged through the normal FOIA process but that would take waaaay too long.

    17. Box_of_rodents on

      Teflon Don strikes again. This is why he suddenly flipped his position to being ok now to have them released because the version being released has only now just been scrubbed of any incriminating evidence against him and his cronies.

    18. PhiloLibrarian on

      We knew that when Trump asked Patel to remove his name from the files over the summer… do we all have short-term memory loss?

    19. Former_Busboy518 on

      Hopefully Epstein’s brother will find a concious and release what he has.

    20. It took months to redact his name from the files. He must be in them an impressive amount for it to take this long in the age of AI automation.

    21. we_are_sex_bobomb on

      I expect *worse than nothing* from these files being released.

      It won’t be done in good faith, it will be done as an attempt to redirect the Epstein story away from the central character of Donald Trump and towards politically harmless scapegoats.

      However I also expect more horrific details about Trump’s many escapades in pedophilia to surface because we’re just at the tip of the iceberg and the truth will out.

      But that won’t happen unless people keep demanding the truth – the real truth and not Trump’s distorted fantasy version of it.

    22. Yeah, I always suspected the delay was just to give them time to get this done.

    23. Genuinely so disheartening that maga people will not put it together that only democrats and Trump’s enemies’ names will be included and how big of a red flag that is

    24. TheGOPisTheDeepState on

      Will look like Mueller report full of redaction to hide Trump’s name. From corrupt AG Barr to Bondi, the Republican Party is a crime syndicate.

    25. TheMagicalMatt on

      It’ll be scrubbed of more than just that. They kept this under lock for over a decade. They’re going to erase anything that isn’t Bill Clinton’s name, including witnesses and accomplices.

    26. Man it’d be some funny shit if they didn’t catch the typos, like the episode of the office where Michael wrote a script and took Dwight’s name out, but missed the Dwigt entries.

    27. BoysenberryShort574 on

      How is it that nobody working at the DOJ blows the whistle on this? I guess their loyalty tests worked and Justice is dead in America.

    28. Tominator55 on

      I’m willing to bet once the files are released, the cover up will be sloppy and that will give it all away

    29. taddymason_01 on

      Wasn’t this already stated months ago that Kash had the FBI scrubbing Trumps and others names or am I misremembering?

    30. cajgolfer87 on

      Of course they are. I hope someone has a real/true copy and will leak them

    Leave A Reply