OpenAI kämpft darum, Millionen von ChatGPT-Gesprächen weiterzuleiten
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/openai-fights-order-turn-over-millions-chatgpt-conversations-2025-11-12/
OpenAI kämpft darum, Millionen von ChatGPT-Gesprächen weiterzuleiten
https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/openai-fights-order-turn-over-millions-chatgpt-conversations-2025-11-12/
8 Kommentare
i mean, with the amount of people misguidedly using chatgpt as a replacement for therapy, i’d say there really needs to be some legal intervention atp. should’ve happened sooner too
>“The court ordered OpenAI to provide a sample of chats, anonymized by OpenAI itself, under a legal protective order.“
Big point everyone is missing here.
What im really concerned about is the people who gave their names or medical information. Is openai going to shift through all that and make sure it doesn’t have that information?
What about chats that have information of children and family members?
>>To be clear: anyone in the world who has used ChatGPT in the past three years must now face the possibility that their personal conversations will be handed over to The Times to sift through at will in a speculative fishing expedition,
But your site says data will be removed in 30 days if you close an account. They need to be sued for this false claim too.
That’s just how legal discovery works. If you do something bad and get sued then obviously any records you have relating to the bad thing you did will get turned over to the party suing you. This does not magically go away when you’re a big company and those records contain user data. In theory users should know that anything they give to a company can be similarly requested in legal proceedings by an opposing party.
The only cogent argument here would be that the sample of data being turned over is too broad, but considering that the data will be anonymized by OpenAI themselves and OpenAI shouldn’t be trusted to accurately filter data for relevance, then this is a reasonable middle ground and so far the presiding judge seems to agree.
Also keep in mind that if the situation were reversed, if OpenAI stood to make a buck from sending your data to third parties, you would not see a shred of this same moral posturing extolling their concern for your privacy.
They plagiarize everything but how dare you subpoena their conversations.
more regulations for AI and these arrogant tech bros for the love of god
Not sure if that’s great for investors that none of the info generated is private
Anyone who thought their chats were private hasn’t learned anything in the last decades of tech companies
If you used AI and assumed your info **wouldn’t** be farmed/harvested/used…that’s on you…