John Ivison: Schlechtes Blut hat Poilievres Konservativen infiziert, und die Liberalen lieben es
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-ivison-bad-blood-has-infected-poilievres-conservatives-and-liberals-are-loving-it
John Ivison: Schlechtes Blut hat Poilievres Konservativen infiziert, und die Liberalen lieben es
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/john-ivison-bad-blood-has-infected-poilievres-conservatives-and-liberals-are-loving-it
4 Kommentare
>Scheer spoke in “a calm and measured voice”).
Pardon me for being highly skeptical of the interpretation of Andrew I was an insurance broker Scheer. Then add his hyper partisanship…
>with Poilievre in the role of the wily, ruthless Francis Urquhart.
Pierre and Jenni may possess the utter ruthlessness, or pettiness, of Francis but they certainly don’t come close to his cunning or reading of things, otherwise Pierre would have pivoted after Trudeau left.
Speaking of Jenni,
>MPs I spoke with are unimpressed by the leadership’s tactics
Including bringing her back if rumors are to be true.
>“They have been acting like bitter juveniles.
Absolutely, and it is what is turning so many away in the party and elsewhere.
>Scheer’s claim that the Liberals are behaving in an “undemocratic” fashion by trying “to cobble together a majority through… backroom deals” takes hypocrisy to levels not seen since President Donald Trump swore to defend the U.S. Constitution. Scheer, after all, was a member of the Harper government that appointed David Emerson as minister for international trade just two weeks after he had been elected as a Liberal MP in 2006
Considering the source………..wow, however that aside it should also be said this was well written, thorough, and stylistically it was an interesting read.
>People who worked on his election campaign said he acted as his own campaign manager but was unwilling to assume any accountability when he lost.
A habit that seems to continue to haunt him.
After a couple of relatively moderate but weak leaders (Scheer & O’Toole) they thought they might gain traction by having a populist leader like down south. And it worked, for a while, with Trudeau making such an obvious target.
Then, when the Liberals did a swapsie and Carney pulled the rug from under Poilievre on so many policy points, it became obvious (even to conservatives) that despite 20 years experience in politics, Poilievre was unable to pivot and simply had nothing new to offer. Now, after losing his seat and parachuting into the safest conservative riding in the country, he still has nothing new to offer. We’re seeing the same old rhetoric, just different words (usually three of ‘em, arranged in a rhyme).
Poilievre’s politics are the politics of grievances and fear, not solutions. We need solutions, and if conservatives want to make headway maybe they should think about electing a leader that has some.
This is what happens when a failed leader doesn’t resign.
Now you have a failed leader with a proven lack of integrity.
What is Bad Blood?
As someone that voted for CPC when O’Toole was the leader, my view is the Poilievre fraction is the bad blood, it is too Trumpian.