Share.

    3 Kommentare

    1. Fricklefrazz on

      SS: Increasingly intense strikes are signaling Jerusalem’s impatience with Lebanon’s efforts to disarm the terror group, but pressure may not be enough to stave off a fresh military op.

      Under the year-old ceasefire deal, brokered by the US and France, the Iran-backed terror group was to be relieved of its arms and prevented from rebuilding its fighting forces.

      Israel has given Beirut an ultimatum that it will carry out a broad operation if the Lebanese Armed Forces do not step up their efforts.

      Lebanon’s president, Joseph Aoun, has made it clear that he wants to see Hezbollah disarmed — using the euphemism “a state monopoly on weapons” — but is also determined to avoid pushing Hezbollah too hard and sparking a civil war.

    2. Lebanon has to choose between a Lebanese state war with Hezbollah on Lebanese soil or another Israeli war with Hezbollah on Lebanese soil.

      I do not envy them this choice, but their position of asking politely for Hezbollah to disarm is absurd.

    3. Specialk3533 on

      « Before the IDF has to » lol. Israel has been violating the ceasefire since Day 1 including destruction of civil infrastructure needed for reconstruction. That’s how you engineer a pretext for the next invasion, because obviously South Lebanese citizens don’t support dismantling Hezbollah under constant bombardment that lets them know Israel wants them off their land.

    Leave A Reply