Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. Engeogsplan on

      There seems to be so little pattern in this map. Except for the far north, where there was little settlement, it seems as if large percentages can live anywhere. I suppose mountains are also a factor.

    2. Excellent_Mud_172 on

      Hey all you genociders out there, this has got to be studied. A little slow, like 1492 to circa 1972, but what an effective job and over such a huge expanse. Impressive. /s

    3. TaskPsychological397 on

      It’s so sad as a Brazilian that Brazil has such a big population and yet is one of or the country with the lowest percentage of indigenous people in the Americas. I wish we had an indigenous language as our national language, the same as Paraguay.

    4. badwithnames123456 on

      Population density or isolation.

      Edit: I mean I’m seeing two different reasons, with some places having high percentages of indigenous people because there were so many people there before the European conquests (Mesosmerica, the Andes), and others being places that were isolated (northern North America, southern South America, etc.)

    5. LiveIndication582 on

      The Santanderes? I don’t even think they’re the whitest part of Colombia.

    6. Old_Barnacle7777 on

      I would be more interested to see a map of people with Indigenous ancestry than this one. I’m assuming this is basically a map representing recognized tribes and land holdings.

    7. Otherwise-Fee-261 on

      Honestly did not expect Guatemala to be so heavily indigenous compared to the rest of Central America. Is there a reason for it?

    Leave A Reply