Ich sehe diesbezüglich unterschiedliche Ansichten. Einige sagen, dass KI Berufseinsteiger und Hilfsarbeiter eliminieren wird, während andere argumentieren, dass sie tatsächlich neue Arbeitsplätze schaffen und die Produktivität der Menschen steigern wird.
Ist KI ein Netto-Arbeitsplatzvernichter, ein Arbeitsplatzschaffender oder etwas dazwischen, das davon abhängt, wie Unternehmen sie nutzen?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulocarvao/2025/11/07/how-ai-is-redefining-the-future-of-work-a-chief-hr-officer-conversation/
1 Kommentar
**Submission Statement:**
As AI becomes embedded in decision-making, hiring, and everyday workflows, some leaders argue it will augment human work rather than replace it. Others believe it could eliminate entire career paths, especially entry-level and routine roles, before new ones emerge.
**Looking ahead:**
* Will AI lead to a world with fewer traditional jobs but more meaningful work?
* How should societies prepare if AI accelerates both productivity *and* inequality?
* Could skills-based hiring and human-AI collaboration redefine what a “job” even is in the future economy?
The article includes an interview with the CHRO of a company (IBM) which has been driving enterprise adoption of AI for a while.
Curious how you all think this will play out in the near future (next 5 to 10 years).
The interview is here:
[IBM CHRO interview](https://www.forbes.com/sites/paulocarvao/2025/11/07/how-ai-is-redefining-the-future-of-work-a-chief-hr-officer-conversation/)