Looks like California is in some good company there 😬
NoneOfThisMatters_XO on
It’s gross and I hate it
Awkward_Passion4004 on
So 18 year olds are legal adults not children.
waits5 on
That much of the country sets it at 16?!? Christ.
Sean10135 on
I think you should be at least 37 before you get married
Crumbsplash on
Most maps here just tell us new Englanders what we already know: New England is better than the rest of America
James19991 on
All but one of the states that have banned it are blue or purple.
Schmeezy-Money on
Yet drinking age is 21 nationally. The 14 year old’s sober wedding night is such a niche cruelty!
General-Ninja9228 on
This is how rock singer Jerry Lee Lewis was able to marry his 13 year old cousin Myra, in Mississippi.
EmiliusReturns on
The states where somehow you can get parental/judicial permission to get married under the age of consent are wild. So the law recognizes you’re not mature enough to consent to sex…unless we agree to issue you a marriage license! Then it’s suddenly ok! And age of consent in most states is what? Like 16-18? Often with Romeo and Juliet clauses? But no such laws for marriage. Crazy.
Adventurous_Ad1922 on
This is not correct. Georgia is 18
No-Abrocoma7687 on
Damn the south sucks….why would anyone want to live in that hell hole.
Ballball32123 on
Red ones have one thing in common.
manitobot on
People have tried to get rid of it for years in California, but for some reason, the ACLU keeps thinking it’s a civil right for children to get married or something.
BizzyThinkin on
Until the 1970s it was considered shocking to have a child out of wedlock. Most of the laws permitting people younger than 18 from getting married without parental consent are to avoid having out of wedlock births. Being a „bastard“ child was considered a curse back then.
Nightgasm on
So if your underage wife sexts you a nude pic are you looking at child porn? Could you be charged for possessing and could she be charged for producing? In sure there has to have been a case at some point dealing with this.
mwatwe01 on
Now do occurrence per capita.
Seriously, is this actually a problem? Or just a sign that our country has some archaic/outdated laws on the books?
SeeLeavesOnTheTrees on
Why on earth would the age be lower for girls?!?!?!
impy695 on
This is a pretty significant improvement as well. The number was 0 to 13 in much of the country until the last 10 or 20 years (so if you’re 23, you could have gotten married to a 90 year old whem you were 13 in many states). Well, assuming you’re a girl. The different ages for boys and girls is/was a thing and should tell you everything you need to know about it.
I assume those are territories in the boxes adjacent to Alaska and Hawaii; most likely those in the pacific such as American Samoa, as I see a couple opposite them which are likely those in the Caribbean: Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. I wish they labeled them
MadameTree on
It’s never boys getting married to older women.
Difficult-Way-9563 on
No person should be able to marry under 18 anymore no exceptions.
fainofgunction on
The marriage laws were established where most communities were small rural and tight knit when there was no such thing as abortion women generally didnt work and a child out of wedlock meant you had no chance of marriage.
This is one reason why Muslims say legally girls can get married at 9 because in rare cases girls can get pregnant at 9 and to save the family honor in a tribal system they have to get married.
The laws are reflecting the reality people lived in.
KatsuraCerci on
Go PNW!
JACC_Opi on
I really want a federal law that ends this!
Congress can end interstate recognition of child marriages, which would mean leaving the state makes the underage person no longer married.
That’s basically how the Defense of Marriage Act worked when it came to states that recognized same-sex marriages. Unlike DOMA, this would apply to everyone and thus it couldn’t be seen as discriminatory under Loving v. Virginia nor Obergefell v. Hodges.
But, what’s up with California and New Mexico?
Jaymac720 on
It should be 18, no exceptions
Eos_Tyrwinn on
This is oddly encouraging. I’m pretty sure that map was a lot worse looking a few years ago
spoiledmilk1717 on
0???
RoofComplete1126 on
We need this to be a federal law 18 or older for marriage.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
32 Kommentare
Looks like California is in some good company there 😬
It’s gross and I hate it
So 18 year olds are legal adults not children.
That much of the country sets it at 16?!? Christ.
I think you should be at least 37 before you get married
Most maps here just tell us new Englanders what we already know: New England is better than the rest of America
All but one of the states that have banned it are blue or purple.
Yet drinking age is 21 nationally. The 14 year old’s sober wedding night is such a niche cruelty!
This is how rock singer Jerry Lee Lewis was able to marry his 13 year old cousin Myra, in Mississippi.
The states where somehow you can get parental/judicial permission to get married under the age of consent are wild. So the law recognizes you’re not mature enough to consent to sex…unless we agree to issue you a marriage license! Then it’s suddenly ok! And age of consent in most states is what? Like 16-18? Often with Romeo and Juliet clauses? But no such laws for marriage. Crazy.
This is not correct. Georgia is 18
Damn the south sucks….why would anyone want to live in that hell hole.
Red ones have one thing in common.
People have tried to get rid of it for years in California, but for some reason, the ACLU keeps thinking it’s a civil right for children to get married or something.
Until the 1970s it was considered shocking to have a child out of wedlock. Most of the laws permitting people younger than 18 from getting married without parental consent are to avoid having out of wedlock births. Being a „bastard“ child was considered a curse back then.
So if your underage wife sexts you a nude pic are you looking at child porn? Could you be charged for possessing and could she be charged for producing? In sure there has to have been a case at some point dealing with this.
Now do occurrence per capita.
Seriously, is this actually a problem? Or just a sign that our country has some archaic/outdated laws on the books?
Why on earth would the age be lower for girls?!?!?!
This is a pretty significant improvement as well. The number was 0 to 13 in much of the country until the last 10 or 20 years (so if you’re 23, you could have gotten married to a 90 year old whem you were 13 in many states). Well, assuming you’re a girl. The different ages for boys and girls is/was a thing and should tell you everything you need to know about it.
This is a ln excellent non profit that ive donated to for years: https://www.unchainedatlast.org/
Why are ANY of these less than 18????? Disturbing. Very.
New Mexico isn’t a common law state and does have a minimum age for marriage on the books. This is BS.
https://law.justia.com/codes/new-mexico/chapter-40/article-1/section-40-1-6/
What’s up with Nebraska? 🙄
I assume those are territories in the boxes adjacent to Alaska and Hawaii; most likely those in the pacific such as American Samoa, as I see a couple opposite them which are likely those in the Caribbean: Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. I wish they labeled them
It’s never boys getting married to older women.
No person should be able to marry under 18 anymore no exceptions.
The marriage laws were established where most communities were small rural and tight knit when there was no such thing as abortion women generally didnt work and a child out of wedlock meant you had no chance of marriage.
This is one reason why Muslims say legally girls can get married at 9 because in rare cases girls can get pregnant at 9 and to save the family honor in a tribal system they have to get married.
The laws are reflecting the reality people lived in.
Go PNW!
I really want a federal law that ends this!
Congress can end interstate recognition of child marriages, which would mean leaving the state makes the underage person no longer married.
That’s basically how the Defense of Marriage Act worked when it came to states that recognized same-sex marriages. Unlike DOMA, this would apply to everyone and thus it couldn’t be seen as discriminatory under Loving v. Virginia nor Obergefell v. Hodges.
But, what’s up with California and New Mexico?
It should be 18, no exceptions
This is oddly encouraging. I’m pretty sure that map was a lot worse looking a few years ago
0???
We need this to be a federal law 18 or older for marriage.