Share.

    26 Kommentare

    1. Earth never could, it was a transition from whale oil to hopefully something better.

    2. Ok fine agreed. The question here is who must make changes and what to switch to.

      The largest cosumers in the worod would be USA, UK, EU, Russia, China, India. 

      The big guys like those need to control themsleves. I live on a tiny Island / state which has less than 100,000 people. Leave us alone, we don’t even touch 0.5 % of the global usage.

      If Lula wants to change this in his own country and has the resoirces to do it, then great good for him. Leave other people alone.

    3. JuggernautBright1463 on

      Earth can, but not humanity. Earth will recover in time but humans are running dangerously close to the edge 

    4. „*We learned a lesson from this problem. We are not going to buy just one plane, but we need to buy several planes. So that Brazil, which is a large country with 8,5 million square kilometers […] we need to prepare ourselves. We cannot be caught by surprise.*“, said Lula in an interview with O Povo radio. [https://www.aeroflap.com.br/en/Lula-wants-more-planes-to-transport-the-president-and-authorities/](https://www.aeroflap.com.br/en/Lula-wants-more-planes-to-transport-the-president-and-authorities/)

    5. Gamblinman97 on

      Lets all fly to Brazil to have a useless summit that achieves nothing lmao

    6. SpeakingTheKingss on

      People need to understand something. Climate change will not “destroy” planet earth. It will kill off life on the planet; Earth will bounce back and be just fine after we’re all gone.

    7. Don’t make it sounds like no one knows that. Different people have been saying that for decades. Just ask Al Gore. Repeating it in slightly different words is not going to change the outcome, and certainly not in a world where „drill baby drill“ won.

    8. Master-Shinobi-80 on

      We should have properly pursued nuclear energy decades ago.

      Even today nuclear energy is going to be required. Germany has spent 500 billion euros and 15 years on their energy transition only to fail. [They are current at 315 g CO2 per kWh.](https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/DE/12mo/monthly)

      [Meanwhile France is at 26 g CO2 per kWh](https://app.electricitymaps.com/map/zone/FR/12mo/monthly).

      26 < 315. Every rational minded person should look at those two metrics and conclude nuclear energy is going to be required.

    9. Outrageous-Pause6317 on

      The earth will be fine. It’s the animals and plants that live here that are going to have a rough time.

    10. Yeah well the guys in the drivers seat seem ok with it, I just fuckin live here man 🙁

    11. CrazyNegotiation1934 on

      It could sustain it if the use was modest, it is a humanity choice to have capitalism and maximize the needless consumption that creates the problem by not prioritizing less consumption.

    12. Shikamarana on

      We were sustaining a non-renewable resource? lol what is this illogical headline?

    13. WorldlyMode on

      says the president of a country that has burned away HOW much of the rain forest for farmland?

    14. geekaboutit on

      We can’t have lithium mines either find a better solution. As of now both gas and electric are shit. 

    15. Anyone else’s dyslexia briefly make them ask what an effete protocol droid had to do with our climate problems?

    16. „That’s why we’re going to slowly sunset current production levels over the next 10 years – also, I’m retiring in two so whatever happens, happens.“

    Leave A Reply