Share.

    7 Kommentare

    1. AlfredRWallace on

      It’s interesting to me that he did this before the leadership review. It’s a positive though, I’m a fairly centrist voter who has been frustrated that the Conservatives keep picking candidates farther from my comfort level. I had the pleasure of watching PP lose my riding and them responding by forcing a new election to keep him in power was a horrible look.

    2. I don’t like PP’s style either, but if this is the rationale then either this man doesn’t take the economy seriously or won’t admit that the Conservative party doesn’t take the economy seriously.

    3. OttoVonDisraeli on

      I am convinced if one or two more MPs cross the floor it’s a leadership crisis for PP. There’s no way he can hold on if he loses the 4 rumoured MPs. One from NS, Two from Québec, One from Alberta. I just can’t see PP holding on after that, especially if it hands a majority over to Carney.

    4. throwitawaytothesea on

      That reasoning is pretty hollow considering it didn’t stop him from running as a Conservative candidate under Poilievre’s leadership in the last election.

    5. Numerous-Bike-4951 on

      Its not because Carney is a “ conservative“ , it because Pierre is not Conservative..

      Moderates are getting more representation then ever as the wings are withdrawing trying to frantically label Carney as being with „them“ .

    6. Poilieve is a dick. His voice is annoying, I find his schtick do annoying that I don’t want to listen to anything he has to say. 

    7. PaloAltoPremium on

      He didn’t seem to have an issue with Pierre Poilievre’s leadership style for the past 3 years. Like him or not, if PP is one thing its consistent in who he is, how he leads and the type of person he is. None of that comes off as ungenuine for better or worse, and he’s been the exact same personality as long as he’s been in public life.

      The reasoning comes off a little lacking here, more so when you look at D’Entremonts public comments and speeches in HoC around this current Liberal Government. Just a month ago he was going on about how this government is harming his constituents, mismanaging the economy, failing to secure a deal with Trump and breaking all their election promises. Now he’s all on-side and not only will support them, but will cross the floor and join them.

      He’s free to do as he thinks best serves his constituents, but I don’t buy his public rational.

    Leave A Reply