I feel like ppl focus too much on stuff being „an advantage“ or not.
Weirdo9495 on
To give one example – Nazi Germany lost a lot of its potential workforce because in WW2 it forced its women to adhere by KKK (Kinder, Küche, Kirche), seeing them as breeding factories for a new generation of what were supposed to be obedient little Nazis for a 1000 year Reich that never came, while allied nations employed them in factories that won the war en masse.
GoodZealousideal5922 on
I mean, he is right, women are half the population and obviously they can provide loads of positive influence on the country. What is weird though is judging on protecting human rights on the basis of whether they provide you an advantage or not. Human rights are supposed to be non negotiable.
tcartxeplekaes on
Wow, no shit. Funny that it’s 2025 and we have to present this as „an advantage“ at a conference
TimInRislip on
Weird how the two european nations currently engaged in a major war dont seem to agree.
MonsterTwerkMachine on
it’s a no-brainer fam. Gender equality ain’t just a ‚tactical advantage,‘ it’s basic human decency.
Adept_of_Yoga on
Twice the number of potential soldiers for the front line trenches of course delivers a significant advantage on the battlefield.
edparadox on
> Gender equality provides a tactical advantage.
How so, exactly?
Because everyone in the comment has his/her own explanation.
Edit: Sure, downvote and put your heads into the sand…
badgersruse on
Is it strategic or is it tactical?
Small_Square_4345 on
Doesn’t this boil down to a simple representation argument:
Why would anyone (men, women, gays, lesbians, trans etc.) rush to defend a society that doesn’t accept them in everyday life?
If you want individuals to risk their lives defending your home and values you owe them respect and equal treatment.
hat1337 on
Yeah, I wonder about physical advantages this may bring.
Lopsided_Advice7180 on
false. give me an only men full army vs a dei army
leonardo-990 on
A quote without much more context and further development…. How useful…
General_Lie on
Kojimas „tactical adventage“ ?
casper_pwnz on
Women should be on the frontlines, not men. They have smaller hitboxes.
_MrSeb on
Man I’m fine and I support women being in the army but inclusion shouldn’t get poured and drowned into the army like all else is being too
sebisebo on
I’m all for equality but please tell me what benefit any of the modern nations got from it (especially “strategically”) other than for women being free (which is reason enough) ?
Cautious-County-5094 on
I mean, it double your potential meat shield numbers…
Reasonable_Run_5529 on
The meat grinder doesn’t care if it’s beef or chicken.
Leave A Reply
Du musst angemeldet sein, um einen Kommentar abzugeben.
19 Kommentare
I feel like ppl focus too much on stuff being „an advantage“ or not.
To give one example – Nazi Germany lost a lot of its potential workforce because in WW2 it forced its women to adhere by KKK (Kinder, Küche, Kirche), seeing them as breeding factories for a new generation of what were supposed to be obedient little Nazis for a 1000 year Reich that never came, while allied nations employed them in factories that won the war en masse.
I mean, he is right, women are half the population and obviously they can provide loads of positive influence on the country. What is weird though is judging on protecting human rights on the basis of whether they provide you an advantage or not. Human rights are supposed to be non negotiable.
Wow, no shit. Funny that it’s 2025 and we have to present this as „an advantage“ at a conference
Weird how the two european nations currently engaged in a major war dont seem to agree.
it’s a no-brainer fam. Gender equality ain’t just a ‚tactical advantage,‘ it’s basic human decency.
Twice the number of potential soldiers for the front line trenches of course delivers a significant advantage on the battlefield.
> Gender equality provides a tactical advantage.
How so, exactly?
Because everyone in the comment has his/her own explanation.
Edit: Sure, downvote and put your heads into the sand…
Is it strategic or is it tactical?
Doesn’t this boil down to a simple representation argument:
Why would anyone (men, women, gays, lesbians, trans etc.) rush to defend a society that doesn’t accept them in everyday life?
If you want individuals to risk their lives defending your home and values you owe them respect and equal treatment.
Yeah, I wonder about physical advantages this may bring.
false. give me an only men full army vs a dei army
A quote without much more context and further development…. How useful…
Kojimas „tactical adventage“ ?
Women should be on the frontlines, not men. They have smaller hitboxes.
Man I’m fine and I support women being in the army but inclusion shouldn’t get poured and drowned into the army like all else is being too
I’m all for equality but please tell me what benefit any of the modern nations got from it (especially “strategically”) other than for women being free (which is reason enough) ?
I mean, it double your potential meat shield numbers…
The meat grinder doesn’t care if it’s beef or chicken.